So there I was, hot tallented model with sunlight streaming through some dense treas in the back ground. My model standing in the shade with the reflection from a window to highlight her hair. Add in some fill flash with a soft box and whos feeling like they nailed the shot, ya me. So I get home and from that shoot half my shots are out of focus. I was using a single point that was basically nailed to the models forehead/eyes and shooting at 2.8 to 3.5 at 7 meters distance.
Whats the deal with how Nikon cameras decide what is considered in focus and how do you get around the problem of a bright background throwing off the accuracy of the cameras focus.
FYI I shot 2.8 and then did extra shots at 5.6 just in case my artsy whim didn't pan out. Yay
Comments
Thanks
Think of it as more of a general question as I have no idea how a Nikon camera determines what is in focus and what could confuse it.
And the release mode ... Was the shutter set to release priorty or focus priorty ? ( Release priorty might be the default @ AF-C ) . At release priorty, camera will shoot even though focus is not acquired.
You can't expect to find get more help without sample photos as others have correctly indicated ... But you can check yourself where the AF point was at those shots - most editing softwares will show it if the photo is not touched.
Sometimes those rectangle markings for focus points are too huge and cover different 3-dimensional objects. To which of them I should direct the cam?
I would expect sharpness given your distances and apertures. Often I guessed the wrong point and used an aperture too wide open. Also, I made better expereinces by using AF-C all the time shooting without tripod, because not only the object is moving, I'm too. I know, AF-C is not the most precise mode - but it handles the fact that my body isn't a tripod better than AF-S, at least wide open. Best thing ist shoot more and get a feeling/experience for focuspoints and substututional objects (with better contrast, clearer lines, but at the same distance as the subject you wnat to photograph.
before doing the real shoot
fire off some test shots and use the magnifier in preview
with a D800 I found AUTO focus is better than spot ( don't know why it just seems to be so)
More and more I am using auto setting settings ( I have been a photographer for 50 years and grew up the manual everything era )
Good luck and happy shooting....cheers.
I too don't think, the TO was calling for gear battle and as well, I think spotmetering is as long no solution as one doesn't know how to use it. Fill flash was already mentioned and a tripod doesn't help focusing in first place although it could be worth a sidelook to the shutter times. Blurred images don't have to be caused by focussing.
No offense, @Golf007sd, but first you were talking about skills, afterwards recommending things to buy. to me, these two subjects, skill and gear, are not coupled together. without skills all gear is useless.
Using a lens hood may help reduce flare. If there's sufficient DoF (with smaller apertures), then maybe put the focus point on the edge of the face or some other high-contrast edge instead of trying to focus on the eyes.
But with very strong backlight and shallow DoF, manual focusing might be the only sensible option.
FB I will be packing a flashlight as I usually don't have an assistant.
So from what I can tell, the camera decides what is in focus by. A: Magic B: Infrared C: Contrast Who cares, i am an expert on lenses.
I noticed there was a large number of photos that the center of the depth of field was approximately 1 ft behind the subjects face that I was spot metering on. I have taken my camera and lenses to Nikon and they did not need any adjustments. My feeling is a low contrast scenario with indirect glare from the side may confuse the camera and cause it to degrade the accuracy of its focuse selection.
In post, the photos were washed out and I had to darken the shadow details. This would make me think I was metering incorrectly but I was metering in spot mode. Oh, and to or not to use a light meter is a topic/debate for a different thred. I metered for the dress of my subject in manual mode, did a test shot, added fill flash as needed.
And as I said, spot metering without being able to interprete the measurements can cause problems, too. Mind you, the exposure meter is adjusted to give a proper result to a graycard with 18% light reflection. Every subject brighter or darker than this value will be shown under- or overexposed in the picture. If you just point the spot meter to a caucasian face, not very tanned, you need to correct the value +1.
D800 • 200mm f2 @ f2 • 1/320 • ISO 100
D3 • D750 • 14-24mm f2.8 • 35mm f1.4A • PC-E 45mm f2.8 • 50mm f1.8G • AF-D 85mm f1.4 • ZF.2 100mm f2 • 200mm f2 VR2
I picked up a camera 9 months ago and am now shooting portraits 2 to 3 times a week and spending time in the west coast mountains shooting landscape, stars, glaciers, ect. This is so addictive and what I thought was a masterful shot 6 months ago I wouldnt now dare show to anyone. LOL
Nice shot Squmish, like the light in hair. A bit strong on top and at the back for me, but does not bother me as much as the in-focus leaves on her right. May be its intentionally so?
As for bright backgrounds throwing off accuracy, I have never experienced that and I shoot with strong bright backgrounds all the time. Maybe in extreme conditions but we are talking exposures of f/11 w/ 1/4000 at ISO 100. I have had really reflective surfaces throw the focus off like mirrored/highly polished outdoor artwork and windows. If light was coming straight into the lens (purposely creating ghosting) that could do it but it would have to be close to the same angle as the focus point.
My guess is that you didn't have some setting set to the best selection for that type of shooting. Paperman has some great suggestions - release priority or focus priority and as others say use AF-S especially if you are reframing the shot. The things to look at is the Focus lock/release with shutter, AF assist... basically check the whole AF menu list. It is good to have the manual at hand to understand the choices.
D800 - ISO 100 - f/5.6 @ 1/1600 - 2 speed lights (Box left slightly higher, Bare flash right 6 feet high, reflector low front right.) This was taken mid morning on an extremely bright and hot day.
In the Nikon implementation, speedlight active AF is only enabled in low-light situations (as opposed to low-contrast situations). So active AF is actually disabled when outside in bright daylight conditions.
Although it's not yet very bright out, I can't get the speedlight AF beam to trigger even once in backlight, regardless of where I was pointing the lens. It always reverts to phase detect, and fails to focus when pointed to a low contrast subject rather than turning on the AF beam.
I can only conclude that speedlight AF doesn't seem reliable in outdoor/daylight backlight situations, if it works at all.
If anyone would like to try the same test: 1) attach speedlight with camera in AF-S mode, center focus point, and verify indoors that the AF beam turns on; then, 2) take the camera outdoors, point it to backlight and see if you can get the AF beam to consistently turn on (or in my case, turn on even once).
Further testing indoors, I also observed something interesting:
With all the room lights on and window shade open, I pointed to camera to the white ceiling and the camera failed to focus (AF beam did not turn on) -- as you'd expect, there's nothing on the ceiling to focus on. But if I turn all the lights off, the AF beam triggers and the camera was able to lock at the featureless ceiling.
So in this case, the camera can focus when it's dark, but can't focus when it's bright (opposite of normal situation). This test seems to confirm that speedlight AF beam gets disabled when there's adequate light for phase detect AF.
Feel free to try for yourself.
Edit: forgot to add, SB-900 on D800e. Might be different with other speedlight/camera combination, I guess.
Nasim Mansurov (the author of TTJ's link) usually knows what he's talking about; but so far I can't confirm via testing that Active AF is actually implemented. (I can't definitely rule it out either). I'll try to email him (and maybe Thom Hogan as he's an expert re: Nikon flashes) to see if they have any further info.
(Sorry Photophun to stray a bit from the topic).
I do know Nikon's is an active system. Always has been. I think phase detect is only for Live View and I assume video?
I have to get a job I'm finishing up out the door so maybe I have time to test it this evening to dig through it. Probably time to write the settings down as well .
Maybe you guys are referring to phase detection vs. contrast detection? Because in Live View, the AF uses contrast detection.