I'm going to look at a D4 tomorrow as a higher frame rate camera than my D800e.
What's brought this about? Well, I've started taking racehorse pictures for a few trainers around and about Lambourn, Berkshire, and more and more, I'm being asked for series photographs of a few of them galloping. The D800e is okay for a few frames and then I hit the buffer, whether it's jpeg(better) or raw(I mainly shoot raw but have been using jpeg to get a few more images together, not ideal)
I've been looking at the D4, but I'm concerned with the 16mp over the D800e 36mp and this is a concern as I've had to have some images printed at A1 size, and with the D800e they still look absolutely stunning, but at 16mp?
That's the question, I know how great the D4 is, but with increasing rumours of a possible D5 or D4x with almost certainly a higher megapixel sensor, do I wait or bite the bullet?
Comments
As for waiting? Well, as with all technology, you could be waiting for a very long time. I wouldn't trade my D4 for anything else that's on the market but I primarily shoot sports.
All shot with a D4 /w 70-200 2.8 VR II -- I did not use any teleconverters on these shots.
1/500 ISO 160 @ f/6.3
Larger Size of Image
1/400 ISO 200 @ f/6.3
Larger Size of Image
1/400 ISO 200 @ f/6.3
Larges Size of Image
1/320 ISO 110 @ f/6.3
Larger Size of Image
1/320 ISO 100 @ f/6.3
Larges Size Of Image
As Obajoba said D4 will give you sharp sequence shots at creditable high ISO.
D4 is a sound investment and is not likely to be obsolete until you have made some money off it.
I need, and have both D 800/4 and am very happy with what I get out of them.
@Golf007sd Post them! I'd love to see them.
Added... Wow! Spooky that you posted as I asked. Great shots. I love the first one. Did you manage to get any sequences? Yeah, pressing my luck here, I know.
Hope you enjoy the D4. Just like what micael66 said, if possible try to rent one. These are some horse pictures taken not from a D4 but a D300.
@michael66: Did you manage to get any sequences? Yeah, pressing my luck here, I know.
Here are some. I've rented the D4 before and anything the D300 can do, the D4 can do far better. Here is a brief sequence of a hunter show (not a race show) taken with a D300 at 8 FPS. Every shot is in focus. The D4 will look even better than these - and these already look pretty decent.
These two are almost 200 feet away.
With the D300 you can get upwards of 25 shots such as these - all in sequence. Every shot in focus. Nothing turns people head more than squeezing off a huge burst. Also the shutter sound of the D4 just sounds better. The D300 is like an AK 47 "Ack" "Ack" "Ack" whereas the D4 sounds like a Browning 50 calibur "Boop" "Boop" "Boop" that just keeps going and going.
The above one is about 100 to 150 feet away. Anything the D300 can do, the D4 will far exceed. Try doing this in low light and the D300 can't do this. The D4 on the otherhand can do such shots even when it's 7 or 8 pm on a summer day. However by about 9:30 PM it's too dark and, unless there's enough stadium light the D4 cannot do fast action shots in sequence.
So yes, if you are a sports photographer the D4 is really nice.
HOWEVER! Just a warning! And this is probably just me, but it might apply to others. The D4's button layout is very different from the D800/E, D600, and D300. It took me a long time before I could get comfortable enough to get good shots reliably. As someone who predominately uses a D300, renting a D800 - it felt like it was a very familiar camera in my hands almost immediately. The D4 on the other hand was very different. I felt as if there was a learning curve that I had to get use too before I could get consistently decent photos - and by then I had to return the D4.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/sets/72157633809491476/
After seeing what @PeterPhamWesley and @Msmoto posted, I now want a D4. I need to find a Sugar Momma or sell my soul. JK but, dang, great stuff. I know how fast these beasts move, both the hoofed and the wheeled variety and have tried these kind of shots with film cameras. Not easy to get a simple shot, let alone a sequence. Well done.
Went to the gallops this morning (very early!) and managed a run of 36 raw images and no buffering!
Amazing piece of kit.
Was in love with the D800e, but now, she's my second love and the D4 my first and true......
By the way, I don't seem to be able to embed a photo of my latest girl, do I need to up my membership or am I being a total dumbass(probably the latter)
its up to you, of course, but i would not go out and buy a $5000 camera because someone asked me for a series of a horse galloping
take 100 pictures, photoshop, change where you are standing, get creative, before you pay 5000
unless they are paying you 6000 of course
But the D4, wow, still amazed by it's capability. Went to a gallop yesterday morning with Nicky Henderson, one of the top National Hunt trainers in the UK, to photograph Bob's Worth , Cheltenham Gold cup winner 2013. Winnings £516, 000, estimated worth £15-20,000,000!
60 frames in one sequence of this amazing horse coming down the gallops. Nicky was incredulous at the quality of the D4 and 70-200f2.8 VRII.
And mikep, the idea of these photos is that the owners and trainers want a quick fire sequence of photos to see the gait and muscle tone, not just stitch a group of photo's together, doesn't show them what they want.
And yes, it does pay well!