My question is, with the high crop factor of the CX format, is it possible to make a fisheye lens for this line? I love the idea of the AW1 for underwater shooting, but would absolutely need an AW1 fisheye lens for underwater work...is it a poor idea to hold out hopes that Nikon will release a waterproof CX fisheye lens for the 1 AW1? Surely I can't be the only underwater photog that has little use for a cam without an extreme wide angle right? If they released a waterproof CX Fisheye I would snap up the camera with that lens and the 10mm F2.8 for land use in an instant.
Comments
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
Msmoto - I certainly love fisheyes too, when used in moderation and properly! As a DSLR out-of-the-water lens they are a specialty piece of glass with low demand, but I would really think for underwater photography either a fisheye or a super wide angle with a 12 or 14mm equivalent would be pretty high demand. For many underwater situations such a lens is a necessity, and are extremely common for surf photography, fishing photography, etc. Most all underwater DSLR folks shoot with a fisheye or UWA much of the time and divers with high quality P&S cams like Canon S100 series and G series use fisheye conversion ports on their housings.
Has Nikon said anything about at least converting already existing 1 series lenses to AW versions? The 6.7-13 would be better than nothing, though something wider would be much better - get super wide and I don't care if it is a fisheye or rectilinear. I am currently using a Canon g12 in a recsea housing with a fisheye fix dome on it for my underwater work and it is so dang heavy for travel/hiking when also carrying my DSLR - I would love to sell it and get a 1AW1 if wide angle was there.
Jürgen
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p295/lorenelliott/IMG_1864.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p295/lorenelliott/IMG_1849.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p295/lorenelliott/DSC_1207.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p295/lorenelliott/DSC_1359.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p295/lorenelliott/DSC_4693.jpg
http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p295/lorenelliott/DSC_4573.jpg
Hi Lorenzo,
Thank you very much! Great and very unique photos. Now I understand better why you want a fisheye.
Maybe Nikon hears you.
Jürgen
Can you give us the Exif data on the shots above?
Oh, I like your images, so I thought I would post a similar situation in the surf...17mm on full frame
part of a sequence of the surf hitting the camera...LOL...and me!
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
We are in the water everyday and right now the water is cold and it will get colder. We are approaching fall turnover when the 39 deg. F. water starts sinking to the bottom. After that we go to Belize and deal with warmer water. We are taking at least 5 Go Pros there and virtually NO OTHER UW cameras. The Nikon 1 AW 1 doesn't seem to have much commitment from Nikon, but it will be interesting to see how it will sell. My guess is it will sell quite well. FOr now we are waiting for someone else to test it!
Thanks Msmoto - and that is a fun shot you posted! Not sure I can embed the exif but I can tell you my usual underwater settings, condition dependent of course:
When I was using the 10.5 DX fisheye lens on a D7000 I usually shot at F4-F8, adjusting in that range as necessary to keep ISO under 1000 and shutter speeds over 1/200. For some of the shots though like the casting shot I would try and get shutter speeds up towards 1/500 to freeze quick motion.
With the Canon g12 I would often times just shoot at wider apertures to get lower ISOs because the smaller sensor would give adequate DOF at F2.8 and I considered lower ISOs mandatory since of course ISO 1,000 looked a lot worse on this cam than it did on a D7000.