I found a pretty cool article about a guy who photographs models of his cars and he situates them with scenery to make it look real. Some of it looks quite good, although in some cases it looks a little off. I think it's pretty cool stuff.
These are fun. Reminds me of the pics I see in the model railroader mag.
“To photograph is to hold one’s breath, when all faculties converge to capture fleeting reality. It’s at that precise moment that mastering an image becomes a great physical and intellectual joy.” - Bresson
It would appear one of the important aspects of this is the very short focal length of his lens....4.5mm, thus allowing great DOF at almost wide open...f/4.5, e.g. And, the most critical factor is his master model building skills. One of the best I have seen.
I just noticed, he's also really good at building his dioramas too. He recreated the stand for when the Chrysler Turbine car was unveiled.
It would appear one of the important aspects of this is the very short focal length of his lens....4.5mm, thus allowing great DOF at almost wide open...f/4.5, e.g. And, the most critical factor is his master model building skills. One of the best I have seen.
Right, it certainly helps that he's using a compact camera because they have very deep depth of field. For this sort of photography it would be essential.
I have thought of trying something like this using the 10.5mm f/2.8 on full frame, but with a crop down to about an area of 7 x 10mm........
Another possibility is the use of a PC (24mm) but as noted the expertise and detail oriented process used is critical. Michael Smith has shown us a new dimension of photography.....
I have thought of trying something like this using the 10.5mm f/2.8 on full frame, but with a crop down to about an area of 7 x 10mm........
Another possibility is the use of a PC (24mm) but as noted the expertise and detail oriented process used is critical. Michael Smith has shown us a new dimension of photography.....
Yes, tilt shift would be another option. But would it even be possible if you stopped down to F22 at 18mm on DX?
The DOF calculator says your total DOF would be 11 ft or so if you were 2 ft away from the subject. Hyperfocal distance is 22 ft. It should be acceptably sharp, but not pin sharp I guess?
Did a DOF calculation using the nikon 1 and 10mm and F8 Subject distance 4 ft
Depth of field Near limit 1.94 ft Far limit Infinity Total Infinite
In front of subject 2.1 ft Behind subject Infinite
Hyperfocal distance 3.76 ft Circle of confusion 0.011 mm
Moments of Light - D610 D7K S5pro 70-200f4 18-200 150f2.8 12-24 18-70 35-70f2.8 : C&C very welcome! Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
Comments
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
I wish he had collaborated on the video opening sequence to "The Fugitive". Would have looked better.
Another possibility is the use of a PC (24mm) but as noted the expertise and detail oriented process used is critical. Michael Smith has shown us a new dimension of photography.....
The DOF calculator says your total DOF would be 11 ft or so if you were 2 ft away from the subject. Hyperfocal distance is 22 ft. It should be acceptably sharp, but not pin sharp I guess?
Subject distance 4 ft
Depth of field
Near limit 1.94 ft
Far limit Infinity
Total Infinite
In front of subject 2.1 ft
Behind subject Infinite
Hyperfocal distance 3.76 ft
Circle of confusion 0.011 mm
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.