I'm not sure what to think of that or how much of a possibility that would work. So much of the system is the dance between the Sensor, Buffer, & Processor that I'm not sure you could really just replace the sensor for something like upgrades. I could see it for same "model release versions" as in to be able to swap the 16mp sensor and 36mp sensors of the D800/D4. (Same parts, just different sensors, (and firmware.)
It is interesting, but too much of each generation of a system is upgraded for it to make since at this time. I'm chalking that patent up to "better do it before someone else does" category.
I doubt this would be useful to us as consumers. I think the idea is simply to make it easier for Nikon to build and repair cameras. It would allow them to use the same body, chipsets, LCDs etc, but put in different sensors to differentiate them.
While interchangeable sensors make a modular design possible, it isn't overly practical for long term use. Why? When a new camera is released users get more benefits than just a new sensor and firmware. Newer, smaller, lower power chipsets are also included.
Post edited by PB_PM on
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
I read the announcement on the patent and thought...what benefit is there for me or the typical consumer. This has got to be more expensive, so why would you do this?
For me, right now I don't see an advantage for me.
D750 & D7100 | 24-70 F2.8 G AF-S ED, 70-200 F2.8 AF VR, TC-14E III, TC-1.7EII, 35 F2 AF D, 50mm F1.8G, 105mm G AF-S VR | Backup & Wife's Gear: D5500 & Sony HX50V | 18-140 AF-S ED VR DX, 55-300 AF-S G VR DX | |SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
Custom sensors for different applications. We tried this years ago, building various CTD sensors that we could mount in the removable backs of film cameras. Some sensors we optimized for dynamic range using non destructive readout of individual pixels, and others we optimized for radiation tolerance or infrared sensitivity, etc. For general photography, I would love to be able to change sensors for the type of shooting, just like we used to be able to change film.
Post edited by Symphotic on
Jack Roberts "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what nobody else has thought"--Albert Szent-Gyorgy
Every sensor is a series of trade offs. If you want to do IR, Solar, or X-ray etc.. you need a specialty sensor for ideal results. Think of how much money you can spend, er I mean fun you can have :-)
Comments
It is interesting, but too much of each generation of a system is upgraded for it to make since at this time. I'm chalking that patent up to "better do it before someone else does" category.
While interchangeable sensors make a modular design possible, it isn't overly practical for long term use. Why? When a new camera is released users get more benefits than just a new sensor and firmware. Newer, smaller, lower power chipsets are also included.
For me, right now I don't see an advantage for me.
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
For general photography, I would love to be able to change sensors for the type of shooting, just like we used to be able to change film.
"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what nobody else has thought"--Albert Szent-Gyorgy
would I buy one? I think so