For the first time in the Uk Nikon are offering a third year warranty for a professional camera the D4, This coupled with an Insurance company, Domestic and General but partnered with Nikon Uk, the cost is £240 for the extended year but does cover all accident damage from date of purchase and has world wide coverage, Plus and this is a big plus, The warranty is transferable to a third party, unlike the Nikon Uk 2 year warranty that comes with Nikon Uk when purchased from official sources in the UK. Normal Nikon UK warranty only applies to the original Owner who must register within a given time to claim the 2nd year warranty and is not transferable.
Camera, Lens and Tripod and a few other Bits
Comments
I got one of the first D4's shipped to Germany and so far had the following issues:
- D4 dropped from a cabinet onto a hard-wood floor. Battery cover broke. Nikon made me pay for the parts only. Workmanship was free
- Pin in the F-Mount was broken, I could not take off the lens which was mounted (Sigma). Nikon repaired under warranty.
- D4 with 24-70 2.8 come off from a Sunsniper belt while I was cycling at a decent speed on a mountain bike trail. The camera took a bad hit, rolled over many times. On the outside it has two minor scratches. I had it checked by Nikon…all ok, nothing misaligned, works perfectly.
I guess I would not spend 240 pounds to extent a warranty.
Jürgen
Hmmmm......maybe that is too much trouble, a camera is not a million dollar plus piece of land.
While what I suggested would almost certainly be legally feasible (unless the warranty contract authors anticipated this, then they could write in a protection, though I doubt it), it would almost certainly not be economically feasible unless I was talking about many cameras or it was incidental. For example, if your photography company was a corporation and you sold the photography company, I am sure the warranty would stay with the corporation as long as the corporation purchased the camera and registered the warranty, in effect transferring to the new owners. I am sure that this is what happens with newspapers when they are sold.
BTW, while I love my job, I love photography even more.
Jürgen
There is no limit on usage So I paid the for policy.Sadly it only covers the body and not any lenses attached at the time, Not sure when I would just take my camera body out without a lens on though, still the body is now covered.
If I wish for you having wasted your money and enjoy a healthy D4, you would be mad at me.
If I would wish you a very nice warranty case, you would be also mad at me.
So I better keep my mouth shut.
:-)
Jürgen
No Juergen, Look at it the other way round, I hope I don't need the insurance claim and have a happy D4. and It is a legitimate tax expense cost, set against gross profits.
First, a pro photographer should have commercial insurance, tailored for a photography business. In Canada coverage starts around $750 / year (around £420/year). It covers all your photography gear, studio equipment, computer / laptop, (digital) negatives, printer & prints, etc., against theft, fire, accidental damage, etc. More importantly it also provides commercial general liability insurance (e.g., in case someone gets hurt during a shoot) and professional liability insurance (e.g., in case bridezilla decides to sue you for allegedly missed pictures). You also get tenant insurance for your studio space, coverage for rental equipment, etc., etc.
While accidental damage is covered, business insurance doesn't cover general repairs. But instead of buying "extended warranty" separately for individual items like for each camera body, each lens, etc., a better approach might to set aside a maintenance & repair fund in the budget.
E.g., you and your accountant might decide to conservatively budget 4% for maintenance and repairs. If you have $25,000 worth of equipment (multiple camera bodies, etc.) then set aside $1,000/yr to cover servicing for ALL of your gear. This includes preventative service (annual checkups, etc.) as well as for repairs.
Chances are, on a typical year you will only use a fraction of the $1,000 budgeted. Paying £240 ($400) up front just to cover one camera body for an additional year seems expensive in comparison. It is an option, but it doesn't seem scalable when you have a lot of equipment to cover.
I certainly would not
Understatement of the year. If you haven't had an accident, you haven't done much!
I have just sold at the third attempt on Ebay my D3X at £1900 00 if I could have offered a warranty I am sure I could have got more. Buyers become very nervous when buying expensive items on Ebay even with a paypal money back guarantee.