Hi. First post, so here goes.
I have some good Nikon glass...85f1.4, 80-200AFS, 17-35, etc. that I used for my F100. In a camera store a while back I was looking at a D610 and talking to a sales person. He said that my lenses would not work as well (be as sharp) as the newer lenses which are made specifically for Digital Cameras. He said it was because the older coatings weren't as good for digital cameras as the newer lenses, and said something about reflected light being "off" with these lenses compared to the new DSLR ones.
I also read something similar somewhere that mentioned part of the reason being that the sensor is "shinier" than the film surface, therefore the "reflection" is "off".
Any thoughts on this? I'd hate to think I have several thousands in lenses that won't work as well, but if that's the case I guess it's just the case. C'est La Vie.
How much difference do you folks think photographic quality will suffer using the older lenses?
Thanks much for any help you can give.
Comments
Not sure of he exact model of the 85, but those other two lenses are in Nikon's lineup today and one is on my "to buy" list (the 17-35). Have lenses improved since then? Sure. Is it worth upgrading? Naw? Buy your D610 and you an use those lenses for the rest of your life. They are professional grade. Just like my 135 and 50mm mf, both 20ish years old and work great on my D800.
And lenses are not designed for digital cameras, digital cameras are designed for lenses (well, I am sure there are some minor design considerations, but when you have a $15,000 plus budget and don't have to make compromises, then we can talk about those issues and also better lenses. Hmmm....I spent over $10,000 this year alone, and I cannot think of any that matter).
So buy your D610 and maybe the 50m 1.4G or 58mm 1.4G if you want professional grade and put the money into good accessories, or lenses that do what your current setup can't (you have a hole in the 50ish range that may or may not matter depending on your subjects).
For Nikon, the issue mostly affects the older AF 50mm/1.8, when stopped down past f/8 in bright lighting conditions. Zoom lenses should be fine.
If you google for "Nikon purple spot" you can read many threads describing the issue.
Anyway don't sweat it, especially if you don't have the older 50mm/1.8. If you keep getting a big purple spot right in the middle of the frame, then it's time to upgrade.
Take a memory card and your glass to the shop
do some test shots with D610 with your glass and the modern equivalent
you may notice a difference, but lenses you have listed, were very good in their day and still are
only you can decide if the difference matters enough to buy new lenses
Nikkor - H 85mm f/1.8 from 1966 on a D4
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/8706075576/sizes/o/in/set-72157630044833773/ - See more at: http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/1714/nikkor-58mm-f1-4#Item_257
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
I have seen some reflections (generally called ghosting - loss of contrast and bright lights reflecting like flairs) with older lenses and I found buying new multi-coated UV filters help quite a bit but I have only had to do that a few times.
Began in August 2010, has 3,500 pages most with images and discussion of lenses and technique, begins at:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/929565
and the most recent is at:
http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/929565/3503
Cheers
Mick
My Nikon Lenses
17-35 F2.8
AF 50D F1.8 (Will probably replace this with the 1.4G fairly quick.)
AF 85D F1.4
105 F2.8 Macro
AFS 80-200 F2.8
Thanks, folks.
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.