For my understanding just like an FYI.
Scenario: I took some photos and didnt do a custom WB with sb-910 and I do not remember if I put on a color filter on flash. ( I have the macbook calibrated with an x-rite)
When I adjusted the contrast, the photo went from normal skin tones to yellow simpsons style skin tone.
After I did the highlights/shadows/etc. adjustments including contrast I moved the temp slider to a cooler tone to fix the issue for a more pleasing skin tone.
Question: why/how/ does the color temp change drastically expecially with contrast. I used LR for the post.
I tried to google an answer but found none. I'm just curios so that I can learn about it.
Comments
on a seperate IT issue, using .jpg im also having a similar issue. All stations have the same color profile, icm linked but they are using a different OS. The images print out with a higher contrast and yellow tint. Everything else is consistent with same printer, same pc same associated color profiles.
i printed both images on both OS and on one it has more contrast and it adds yellow to it. While the photo with more contrast is better on the eyes the yellowing makes the photo unnacceptable.
The issue is with the OS upgrade that we need to do and processing software is not used other than for scanners but they use the same associated color profile.
In general, increasing contrast may also increase our perception of saturation.
So something to try: starting with the original image, set the white balance, then add some contrast as before. But instead of adjusting the white balance again, reduce saturation instead.
Also, knowing this, if you add saturation and then add contrast, the resulting image (especially skin tones) can easily get over saturated and look very unnatural.
The saturation effect is also there even if everything is set correctly: Use levels adjustment more deliberately, and you will ruin nice skin tones and get the skin look reddish, orange-y and the like. That's why you always have to go for a little de-saturation if you enhance contrast on the skin anyway.
Original image:
Contrast increased one "full slider" in LR 5.3
Contrast increased one "full slider" in LR 5.3 plus full contrast brush stroke
Contrast decreased one "full slider" in LR 5.3
Make you own conclusions, but there are some differences. No other adjustments were made.
@Msmoto: Excellent illustration, thanks for the work!
I find it funny that this appears as such a "surprise" effect and difficult to handle. It was one of the first issues I ran into when I didn't know anything about retouching and started to use Photoshop to "enhance" images. Increasing contrast increases saturation, it's as logical as that increasing contrast means losing tonal differentiation and 'saturating' the blacks and whites. Translated into the different color channels, as @PitchBlack said, means: saturation.
I needed some info like @msmoto @pitchblack and like you have mentioned so that I can pass that info on.
For comparison I know that if i turn the key on a car it will ignite. But there is more to it such as a starter, fuel combustion etc.. Cause and effect.
Im working with a team that doesn't deal with photography or colors but the comments in this thread will help me explain how the contrast is causing the saturation and we can figure out where the source of the problem is.
My guess it's user error but it doesnt explain how the prints look good until you upgrade os.
The more i tell them about monitor calibration and using the same monitor across the less they listen to me. Thats probably the only hardware that is not consistent acrross. My guess is that somebody decides that the image needs adjustment and they adjust to their liking all while they have been told not to.
Thanks everybody for your input and especially @msmoto for the extra work.
@ironheart yep. its still not resolved but will address at next time im at the office.