I’m looking to buy a Nikon D7000. Right now there are 2 people selling used cameras in my area. One has the D7000 with the 18-105mm lens for $700, and the other has the camera with the 18-200mm lens for $900.
Main question: Is the 200mm kit worth $200 more?
I’m a college student, so I can’t stretch my budget too much, but if the advantages are $200 better I could probably wing it.
Thanks
Comments
are likely to buy something like the 70 -300 in the future, if you are, then maybe go with 18 -105
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
------------------------- I don't think you guys read my post at all.
Is it worth the the $200 for the 18-200 lens? Depends, how are you going to use the camera and lens? What type of subjects? Go to B&H and check out the price for both lens and see what the spread is. If it's $300 then yes it's worth paying $200 more for the longer lens. I just don't have that info available right now.
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
18-105 Used D $224
http://www.adorama.com/US 614018.html
18-200 VR I Used E+ $339
http://www.adorama.com/US 620743.html
18-200 VR II Used E+ $419
http://www.adorama.com/US 621238.html
18-200 VR II Used D $444
http://www.adorama.com/US 620626.html
New, the 18-105 is $400, the 18-200 VR II $850 ($250 good to march 1 rebate gets you to $600)