Hello. I'm new here and about to order my new camera. Would this lens be a good starting point for the camera, I already have a 70-300 VR lens and 80-400 vr but am looking for a smaller zoom to use for normal everyday use.. Would appreciate help with this before I buy the wrong lens!
Nikon D7100 for sale, Nikon D800e
Nikon 24-85 VR F/3.5-4.5 , Nikon 80-400 VR F/4.5-5.6 G ED :
Comments
http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/114/lenses-that-would-match-d800-/p1
http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/1142/sorry-to-ask-highest-resolution-lens-for-d800/p1
http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/2296/best-lenses-for-the-nikon-d800e-/p1
And, as to the lens, I would suggest the 24-70mm f/2.8 or the 24-120mm f/4 VR. If you can afford the D800 do not skimp on the glass. However, for the money it would appear the 24-85 is very good, maybe not so great toward the edges.
Nikon 24-85 VR F/3.5-4.5 , Nikon 80-400 VR F/4.5-5.6 G ED :
http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/764/new-nikkor-fx-18-35-f3-5-4-5g-lens/p1
but no one seems to have tried one
I would suggest the 24-70mm f/2.8 or the 24-120mm f/4 VR.
The 24-70mm f/2.8 Is a superb lens but it is three time the price of the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5
There seems to be stigma on NRF about variable aperture lens, the early one did not get good reviews but the reviews of latest suggest it is sharp and very good value for money
my person mid range zoom is the 24 -120 f4 VR but this heavier and more expensive
Of course it's not uber sharp wide open but performs well enough stopped down. Here's an example shot with it.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/emceee17/8076800730/in/set-72157631295951122/
The 24-70 + 70-200 + 80-400 gives you great coverage. Then consider buying some prime lens; i.e. 85mm is a good first prime. As several have said, take the time and read the links above. There are lots of comments on which zoom and which primes to buy.
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
Personally, I would choose the 70-200 and get a faster better lens from 70-200 and give up a little image quality at 400mm, but that depends what you are shooting.
However, for that small improvement in image quality (and image quality is not the end all of be all, or else you be buying primes and not zooms), the money you save you can buy the 85 1.4G. Really, is that worth and 85 1.4G???
Nikon 24-85 VR F/3.5-4.5 , Nikon 80-400 VR F/4.5-5.6 G ED :
the D800 is one of the best cameras in the world
Get the D800 and the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5 and upgrade the lens when you have more cash
@nikon_jonathanbruce: For what you want it for and given you aren't printing out images the size of billboards, the D610 is everything you need, so get the D610 and 24-70.
My recommendation to all new photographers is figure out your gear in this order:
1.
Identify subject type (might be several, such as portrait, macro, landscape, architecture, kids, underwater, travel etc.).
2.
Determine lens that works well with the subject type (performance, cost, compatibility with systems etc.) (might be several to deal with several subject types).
3.
Then determine what piece of digital junk you are going to bolt onto the lens for 4-8 years. And yes, a camera is digital junk. If you buy good glass, your second or third camera will be at the garage sale before you really need to think about upgrading the glass and even then it will be "want", not "need".
Take a look at the Tamron 24-70/2.8. It has VR and is $500 cheaper than the Nikon. There is quite a bit of debate about this, but the various reviewers of the lens puts it at just below to just above the Nikon. Certainly better than the 24-85 f/3.5-4.5.
My post today on PAD, with the Nikkor 28-85 3.5-4.5….
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/13030878554/
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
No light…the lens is maxed out at f/5.6 when this close and I shoot 1/160 sec to diminish subject movement, thus the ISO of 8000….which I do not consider high. In fact, the cat moves so much, especially when the camera is so very close, the majority of images were not acceptable due to subject movement. So, I might have cranked up to 16,000, used 1/320 sec...
Presuming you're talking about the non-VR version built from 2002-2006, I'm a big fan of this lens. I have only one example of this lens in use at my Flickr photostream:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68039985@N08/7276501112/in/photostream
Simon Stafford, in his big Nikon Compendium, is a fan as are both Kenny and Thommy:
http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/2485afs.htm
http://www.bythom.com/2485lens.htm
As for those suggesting the 24-70mm lens, it's twice the weight and the use of the 85mm end on FX (130mm on DX) is an added benefit for portraiture.
A goodun' IMHO.
MIck
I Have now got the D800e and love it. should I keep my D7100 as a backup or sell it for more glass ?
Nikon 24-85 VR F/3.5-4.5 , Nikon 80-400 VR F/4.5-5.6 G ED :
Great question…. do you ever use two bodies when shooting? Or, in remote venues, do you want a backup body? Maybe for action shots or long telephoto…the D7100 is better. What you get from a used D7100 will not buy much in glass. I would keep it unless someone offers you a super price….
Nikon 24-85 VR F/3.5-4.5 , Nikon 80-400 VR F/4.5-5.6 G ED :
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
If you sell the second body, put the money towards the new AF-S 80-400mm, it's awesome, but only if you can handle the high price. Great investment of your hard earned money, considering what the next level up, big boy lenses cost.
Chas
SB-910~WG-AS3, SB-50, ME-1, Lexar Professional 600x 64GB SDXC UHS-I 90MB/s* x2, 400x 32GB SDHC UHS-I 60MB/s* x1
Vanguard ALTA PRO 263AT, GH-300T, SBH-250, SBH-100, PH-22 Panhead
Lowepro S&F Deluxe Technical Belt and Harness ~ Pouch 60 AW 50 AW & 10, S&F Toploader 70 AW, Lens Case 11 x 26cm
FE, NIKKOR 2-20mm f/1.8, OPTEX UV 52mm, Vivitar Zoom 285, Kodacolor VR 1000 CF 135-24 EXP DX 35mm, rePlay XD1080
Full size
enlarged to 50% and cropped
enlarged to 75% and cropped
enlarged to 100% and cropped
As an aside, in my opinion the 24mp FX sensor in the D600/D610 is really great and all one needs for almost anything.
The 24-85 looks pretty good at f8, but I'd prefer to have that sharpness across f4-f11.
The difference between the D800 and D610 is way beyond the sensor, The pro UI of the D800 is faster handling, AF is faster etc.
If one likes the prosumer UI of the D610, and can live with he AF, then IQ with a top lens will be outstanding, but those are big 'ifs' and would drive me to drink blended Scotch. Anonymously of course.
.... H
Nikon N90s, F100, F, lots of Leica M digital and film stuff.