Hi all I was looking at a photograph of a beautiful sunset and was wondering how to capture those lovely colours . I use a Nikon d90 with a Tokina 12-24mm lens. Would I use the landscape setting or the vivid setting please could someone advise me kind regards Arthur Hughes
Comments
I have also had luck with a graduated neutral density filter but sometimes don't have time to get it out. The window for peak color is so narrow, you need to shoot lots of pictures.
|SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
post, with something like Lightroom, when you get home
Use ISO 200 for maximum dynamic range
If you use a tripod and bracket, you can play with layers in CS5 or similar
See more at: http://forum.nikonrumors.com/discussion/2390/variable-nd-filters-disappointment-how-can-they-even-sell-them/p2#sthash.6jPEKTum.dpuf
A deliberately under exposed flash (always expose for the colour / light you want) will help soften any reachable darker shadows without making it too obvious. The width of your lens may be an issue unless you are blessed with regular "whole of sky" sunsets/sunrises. As these are rare in my part of the world, I prefer the range between 35mm-100 mm on FX depending on the location and conditions. Good luck with shooting nature at its best!
Exposure….I will use matrix, and view the histogram. Then bracket some test exposures and finally as the sun gets into position…and it moves very quickly with long lenses….grab the exposures. 1/640 sec, f/13, ISO 640. The filter is a B & W 092 with a filter factor of 3X as I remember. The entire procedure is one of trial and error and lots of attention as to what is going on.
Nikon D90….
12-24mm f/4 Nikkor on D90 1/250 sec f/8, ISO 200 at 13mm… oh, sunset, sunrise…about the same issues IMO
Here's a sunrise over Porpoise Bay, New Zealand. I took about 100 photos bracketing by -1 ev, 0 ev, and +1 ev. Some of the pictures were of the pink clouds before sunrise, so about 50 w/ sun, 50 w/o. Probably about 5-8 keepers once I looked at them on a bigger monitor.
D600, 24-120 f/4 @ 120mm, f/8, ISO 100, Aperture priority, -1ev, 1/2000 sec.
“A good photograph is knowing where to stand.”
Ansel Adams 1902 – 1984
however
“To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
Edward Weston 1886 – 1958
I don't mean to sound smug, I just don't have a problem. All but 'the' shot at the sunset's peak get deleted. I have never, ever felt the need to shoot 100 shots of any scene and never bracket to the extent above. You tend to know whether you are shooting a silhouette shot or a bracket set for an HDR before you get to the best shot time.
Was this:
I shoot a fair amount of sunsets and everybody has their own style and technique. I suggest you experiment beginning with a the lowest ISO you can get away with to control noise, a small aperture (f/14 and above), and a shutter speed appropriate for the aperture and ISO. The light will change constantly. I typically shoot quite a few frames because the light is always changing and there will be a limited period of time when it is at its best. As others have stated, you can always delete the extras. It never hurts to use a tripod; particularly if you are going to hang around for the after sundown shots where workable shutter speeds are quite slow. Most likely there will be extreme contrast if the sun is in the frame. Be careful about blowing out the highlights to the point where they cannot be recovered in post.
Here are three shots taken over a span of 46 minutes. The last was a few miles distant. I thought I had seen the best light of the day at the sunset. I was wrong. The best light was 45 minutes later as I was driving up the coast. I immediately did a U-turn and shot the third image out the car window prior to parking. More sunsets sprinkled throughout my Flickr site.
Good luck!
“To consult the rules of composition before making a picture is a little like consulting the law of gravitation before going for a walk.”
Perhaps this quote may be out of context. I do a lot of "street" shooting, straight from the hip. The camera never comes up to my eyes. Frankly, I am more concerned about getting something into the frame and in focus than about perfect composition. Is this the type of photography the venerable Edward Weston was referring to?
I suggest that for very many, the effects of gravity and our responses are natural and instinctive. Equally the rules of composition to many people are as instinctive as swimming is for the first time. For some, neither are ever mastered and for others, never attempted. Rarely is understanding good composition an instinct. Of course, one need never follow the rules... but knowing them and their consequences before breaking them is often advisable.
Thank you to Sevencrossing for motivating me to revisit Edward Weston, a co-founder of the Group f/64 club. Here is an interesting quote from the man billed as one of America's most innovative and influential photographers; “The camera should be used for a recording of life, for rendering the very substance and quintessence of the thing itself, whether it be polished steel or palpitating flesh.”