I saw that too and I got a chuckle out of it. There are a lot of companies that focus on industrial imaging that use Nikon mounts. Nikon must have got into that market eons ago with their lenses and the mount just was adopted. I have seen gobs of the manual focus 55mm macros used on equipment. Most of them have to be 20+ years old. Makes since for companies to match imaging units to existing set-ups.
Or simply that they don't make industrial class lenses. My guess is that the Nikkors we put on our standard DSLR's are not the ones used in industrial applications.
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
Or simply that they don't make industrial class lenses. My guess is that the Nikkors we put on our standard DSLR's are not the ones used in industrial applications.
TTJ is right again. Nikon has a long history of selling to the industrial market. Many industrial cameras use standard Nikkor lenses. We (Symphotic TII Corporation) have a laser spectroscopy system for remote chemical sensing that uses a sony camera and a Nikkor mount. We use a standard 180 mm f/2.8D Nikkor. The only other option we use is C mount lenses, but we prefer the Nikkor 180.
Post edited by Symphotic on
Jack Roberts "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what nobody else has thought"--Albert Szent-Gyorgy
Or simply that they don't make industrial class lenses. My guess is that the Nikkors we put on our standard DSLR's are not the ones used in industrial applications.
Actually they are - most are the old manual focus 55mm f3.5 or f2.8 versions of lenses and even some 60mm 2.8s. Every once in a while I saw some old 50's as well. I did see some rubber boots over a few, but from the look of things, It was probably added after the fact.
... Many industrial cameras use standard Nikkor lenses. We (Symphotic TII Corporation) have a laser spectroscopy system for remote chemical sensing that uses a sony camera and a Nikkor mount. ....
We also have a particle counting system that uses a Nikon microscope objective coupled to a commercial off the shelf Nikon D5100 DX camera. The D5100 is overkill for the application, but the price is right.
Post edited by Symphotic on
Jack Roberts "Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what nobody else has thought"--Albert Szent-Gyorgy
Comments
There have been adapters for Canon, to using Nikons fine lens lineup, and others for along while.
http://diglloyd.com/articles/ask/lenses-LensAdapters.html
http://www.16-9.net/nikon_g/
http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/roxsen-converter.htm
http://www.camerahacker.com/Novoflex/EOSNIK.shtml
Too bad it can't work both ways...
Chas
SB-910~WG-AS3, SB-50, ME-1, Lexar Professional 600x 64GB SDXC UHS-I 90MB/s* x2, 400x 32GB SDHC UHS-I 60MB/s* x1
Vanguard ALTA PRO 263AT, GH-300T, SBH-250, SBH-100, PH-22 Panhead
Lowepro S&F Deluxe Technical Belt and Harness ~ Pouch 60 AW 50 AW & 10, S&F Toploader 70 AW, Lens Case 11 x 26cm
FE, NIKKOR 2-20mm f/1.8, OPTEX UV 52mm, Vivitar Zoom 285, Kodacolor VR 1000 CF 135-24 EXP DX 35mm, rePlay XD1080
There are a lot of companies that focus on industrial imaging that use Nikon mounts. Nikon must have got into that market eons ago with their lenses and the mount just was adopted. I have seen gobs of the manual focus 55mm macros used on equipment. Most of them have to be 20+ years old. Makes since for companies to match imaging units to existing set-ups.
But you can also look at it as Canon admitting their glass isn't as good as Nikkor.
Many industrial cameras use standard Nikkor lenses. We (Symphotic TII Corporation) have a laser spectroscopy system for remote chemical sensing that uses a sony camera and a Nikkor mount. We use a standard 180 mm f/2.8D Nikkor. The only other option we use is C mount lenses, but we prefer the Nikkor 180.
"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what nobody else has thought"--Albert Szent-Gyorgy
"Discovery consists in seeing what everyone else has seen and thinking what nobody else has thought"--Albert Szent-Gyorgy