I just made the change from DX to FX (d600) and sold off all my DX glass. I was not expecting to do any "real" shoots before May and haven't purchased much glass in FX. I was asked yesterday to shoot a concert tonight so I decided to rent a lens for the night. I don't shoot much in the way of concerts, so I thought I would get some opinions about which lens to go with.
I have: 28-300 f3.6-5.6, 35 f1.8 (DX) which works ok but vignettes hard and corners are really rough
The Venue: A small (200 person) church, reasonable lighting most of the time. I should have really good access to the front of the stage and no significant restrictions. There is a balcony about 100ft back and around the sides for higher angle shots.
My options 1. 14-24 f2.8- I love wide angles and for a concert where I am close the limitations of wide angle are much reduced. Awesome crowd shots. 2. 24-70 f2.8- Covers the standard zoom. A solid upgrade in every way from the 28-300 I would be using otherwise. Missing "wide" and missing "zoom" 3. 70-200 f2.8- Not much else to say. It's a great lens but it is a small venue. I am concerned that if I am at the front of the stage I'll be locked into just headshots.
Am I missing a lens that I should be looking at? Rent a prime instead? If you could only rent one lens- which of those would you choose?
24-70 f/2.8 without a doubt - for me at least. I realise that most of what I've shown here recently has been with the 70-200 but that was principally to test the new lens.
Of course, when you talk about a balcony 100ft away, then you're moving into 70-200 territory. Personally I'd prefer to stay in close with the 24-70, but that's just A: Me and B: The venues I tend to shoot in allow this.
Slightly off-subject, but reasonably valid - if you're looking for an ultra-wide, try the 16-35 - it's pretty much the same angle, it's got VR and I'm not afraid to take it out in public - sorry but the huge front element (without protection) on the 14-24 scares me s******** ! (Which is why I sold mine)
Of course, it's also considerably cheaper - and the loss of one stop isn't really noticeable.
It ended up being much darker than I expected: EV 8-9.
I rented the 24-70 2.8, but really should have just gotten a prime lens. ISO 6400, f2.8, 1/30-1/80. With the price (and IQ) of the 50 1.8 and the 85 1.8 I should be adding them to my bag soon to avoid this problem in the future.
I have heard wonderful things about the 16-35 VR f4 and it will be in my bag before vacation in May. I wish this hobby wasn't so expensive...
I would have certainly gone with the 50mm, 85mm, & 16-35vr. Concerts are rough to shoot, especially if you don't do it often as there is a lot of intuition that goes into it.
Comments
Of course, when you talk about a balcony 100ft away, then you're moving into 70-200 territory. Personally I'd prefer to stay in close with the 24-70, but that's just A: Me and B: The venues I tend to shoot in allow this.
That said, I too like wide angle and I hope I can add the 14-24 to my lens collection but it's just too expensive for me right now.
Of course, it's also considerably cheaper - and the loss of one stop isn't really noticeable.
I rented the 24-70 2.8, but really should have just gotten a prime lens. ISO 6400, f2.8, 1/30-1/80. With the price (and IQ) of the 50 1.8 and the 85 1.8 I should be adding them to my bag soon to avoid this problem in the future.
I have heard wonderful things about the 16-35 VR f4 and it will be in my bag before vacation in May. I wish this hobby wasn't so expensive...
www.flickr.com/photos/rxgus/
D3s 16-35 @ 19mm 15/s f/4 ISO 8000
D600 24-300 @72mm f/5.0 1/80 ISO6400
24-70 @ 70mm, f/2.8, 1/80, ISO 2800
24-70 @ 24mm, f/2.8, 1/80, ISO 6400
www.flickr.com/photos/rxgus/