Okay, I know this is somewhat off topic -- but where better to ask an optics question than on a photography forum?
Question: Why are lenses made of glass always sharper than lenses made of other substances, such as various optical plastics? Is there a substance other than glass that could make a sharper lens than a glass lens?
I have a very personal reason for asking -- my glasses. I've had glass lenses "forever" and my glasses weigh a ton. With my current prescription, my optician has been unable to find a lab willing to make it in glass. The lab that made my last three or four prescriptions says they've tried to make the prescription in glass several times and the lenses keep breaking when mounted.
I'm currently trying out high-index plastic lenses (ones with an index of refraction very close to glass), and I very much like the weight of the glasses, but the focus is very soft and beyond about a hundred feet, focus degrades rapidly. I've tried plastic lenses before, and with every previous try, I've also had an issue with sharpness and a loss of focus at distance which does not occur with glass lenses of the same prescription.
So, back to my questions:
1) What is it about plastic lenses that make them less sharp than glass? I've found the closer to glass the index of refraction is on plastic lenses, the sharper they are -- but why is that?
2) Why the loss of depth of field in plastic lenses relative to glass lenses?
3) Is there any substances that give a sharper focus than glass? If so, what about that substance makes the focus sharper?
Thanks in advance for any technical explanations anyone can provide.
I know this is somewhat off topic, but I'm certain that the same theoretical questions about vision glasses also apply to camera lenses! :-)
Thanks!
JK
Comments
If your glasses aren't sharp, they are made incorrectly. Have your optician try a different lab and just use the most modern and most expensive lens material they have. That's what I just did for my newest pair, and I have better than 20/20 with my glasses, they darken automatically in the sun, scratchproof, smudge proof, lightweight, etc... I think you got a bum pair or you went cheap and actually got plastic rather than a more modern material.
@Ironheart: Interesting: Do you notice any CA with your new polycarbonate spectacles? Also, when you say 'scratch proof', it is the coating on glasses that usually gives up, are your coated and if so, the coating is usually softer than the base material and so will scratch.
In the past 4 or 5 iterations of lens prescriptions, I've usually started with the "latest and greatest" high quality non-glass lenses. I've then worn those glasses for a couple weeks, had problems from day one with image softness and focus loss at distance, then had the lenses remade in glass (wearing the "plastic" ones while the glass ones were made -- usually 3 to 4 more weeks), then switched to the glass lenses when I received them -- and they were sharp and I had no problems at distance, ever. So, I don't have a problem with my eyes needing to adjust to my new prescription.
I've had both the optician and my ophthalmologist (no business relationship between them) check the non-glass lenses and the glasses have been made correctly, so that is not an issue.
The optician claims that all non-glass lenses are never as sharp as glass, and that it's his understanding that it is due to the difference in the index of refraction of the material. I will say that it has been my experience that the higher index plastics (ones closest to glass) are the sharpest and have the greatest depth of field.
So, I guess my real question is: How does the index of refraction of a material effect the sharpness of its focus and its depth of field?
JK
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
I have rather substantial prisms in my glasses, and without them I have no depth perception during the day and double vision at night.
In my experience, the wider the lenses of my glasses are, the thicker they have to be. Have you considered or tried glasses that don't have as wide a field of view as your current ones? That would reduce the weight, I would think.
Actually, it's the curvature of the optical surface(s) of the lens not its thickness that matters. What determines the angle of bending (refraction) relative to the normal to the optical surface is the ratio of the index of refraction of the optical material to the index of refraction of air. It's called Snell's Law. In the classical approach to optics, a light ray bends when it enters a lens of given index of refraction, travels on a straight line within the lens regardless of the physical thickness of the lens, then bends agains when it emerges from the lens. Perhaps the plastic lenses are not being molded into the proper shape for your extreme prescription.
JK1231, I feel for you. Glass gets so much thicker (and heavier!) than plastic. I have seen "coke bottle" lenses. I am very thankful for the plastic technology, but my optometrist agrees that Glass is "sharper" although it has its price (in weight/thickness).
Anyway, there's no arguing that the world looks different through an empty Shott Glasss!
Sorry, couldn't resist!
surprise surprise there are lots of different types of Plastic lens
Trivex is mentioned as the latest and greatest
Most UK opticians whist giving you the choice of Aurora,BOSS Orange, Cheap Monday,FCUK vision,French Connection, Gok Wan, John Rocha, Karen Millen, Osiris, Quiksilver, Red or Dead, Replay, Roxy, Timberland or Tommy Hilfiger, frames
The choice lenses is limed to, standard , or premium, no information what they are made of