The scenario: You've got a Product you're going to announce in four weeks. It's neither a modest upgrade nor the Greatest Thing Ever, but you think it's very good. I'm not going to describe the product, create one in your own mind if you need to, but for the sake of the exercise:
--A very large percentage of Nikon pros, a very large percentage of enthusiasts, and some consumers will want it
--the price point will be OK for 80% of the people who want it
--release in three months (two months after announcement). You do think it's going to be a hit but you can't reliably guess how much built-in order backlog it will be.
The goal: you want to sell as many units as you can as quickly as you can. That's it.
The question: How do you manage the next four weeks before the announcement? Possible options:
1) Do not actively manage what gets out. Que sera sera.
2) Aggressively try to keep the product/specs under wraps until the announcement.
3) Strategically leak to sites like [NR] to both build anticipation and make sure the leaks don't over-promise.
4) Make sure a prototype gets "accidentally" spotted somewhere/reported on.
5) Something else/some combination.
Please advise.
Comments
everyone else seems to get there information from NR
NRF will pull it apart, before anyone has even tested it
And as quick as possible with the rumour, lol.
But seriously from a business point of view. He will need to generate a lot of interest in the product without giving too much away. I.E. let a very little piece of the information leak to a very popular website
Robin
Everything else will take care of itself.
In my opinion, the worst case scenario is to have the announcement go by and have no one notice or care. A low-key announcement with minimal publicity beforehand (to keep secrecy) is probably the most likely way to do this.
This is Nikon we're talking about, which has already built quite a following over the entire spectrum. You estimate that a large percentage or pros will want it, this alone means you really don't need to market the product as much as you would consumers. I don't agree with jerl's tactic that you need to have lots of coverage with review sites. Professionals already will know what they want once they see it. Its the average consumers that need to be constantly marketed to because they don't necessarily know what they want, they have many options to choose from, and their expenditures are more elastic since they aren't tied down into the system.
As others have mentioned, you don't want to sell a lot of this product, especially if your main audience are professionals. High end product and high sale volumes are almost always negatively correlated, and for good reason: quality control, customer service, brand image, product differentiation, different market share, etc.
The strategy of launching these units is similar each and every time and holds true for many products, not only cameras: first you sell to the geeks for a price premium. You fire them up with s.c. Leaks and reports about "sightings", maybe some random samples on the net or on specialized magazines. Then you iron out the bugs of the alpha release . Then you start selling to the average customer with no specific knowledge and control demand over the price (see: D800, D600 rebates). Exposed persons in the genre are welcome multiplicators here ("I want the softbox that Joe McNally has")
The trick is to find out how much extra the geeks are willing to pay for the initial launch. I had the impression that the price was too low for the D800 (months of backorders) and slightly high for the D600 (quickly saw rebates).
I am pretty sure that the marketing strategy for the launch welcomes sites like NR and that they are happy to feed the frenzy. ]
Leaks are always useful when gauging interest (to set the price, estimate production volume, and make any last minute product decisions).
Trying to have it seen in the hands of a respected pro is good.
Marketing creates awareness and appetite for a product - the Sales department control sales so if marketing fail, sales have to create sales with less productive pricing strategies.