Hello all!
So i just watched a video on fine tuning your focus on a lens. So i figured why not give it a try! Now i just got my D750 back from the flare fix a few weeks ago and so i dont have results of before vs now. Anyways so i printed out the focus chart, layed it flat on a table and shot in the center as described at 1.8 while shooting at a 45 degree angle. I find that for this lens i need to push the focus up all the way to 20 in order to get proper center focus with this lens. Now mind you i just got in a tamron 70-200 2.8 and that only needed a +9 adjustment. I then tried the nikon 24-85 3.5 (which isnt as good to compare i know because its at 3.5 but i wanted to compare anyways) so then tried at and it seemed to need +7.
So my question from what i see is:
A) since there isnt much of a change in fine tuning for the rest of the lens i am to assume that the 50mm is more of the problem then the camera is?
Has anyone else had this problem at 1.8 on their 50 or is this super out of spec?
C) Suggestions as to what to do
Thank you all so much for your time!
Comments
The lens is quite crappy till you hit f2.8 ( which provides enough DOF to cover the focus issue ) so really no reason to worry about slight back/front focus at f1.8 as using it wide open creates more problems than just focus.
And I had the problem on a D300; the lens will probably perform worse on a D750. You know the focus mechanism is quite cumbersome ; the whole lens shakes and all. It would be a miracle for it to get the AF spot on every time.
How far away are you from the target?
I don't know my 50/1.8G adjustment value by heart, but it could be +17. I've always had to adjust all my lenses, back with Canon as much as with Nikon today, and it's not a matter of the price of the lens. Some people are lucky with this and don't need to adjust much or at all, some aren't.
Do keep that advice by @ironheart in mind, if you don't align the chart properly, your adjustment will be flawed. You can use the grid and guide lines in the viewfinder.
Thank you all so much this is such a great community!
So, i will do the AF adjustment multiple times, then try to pick the value which is in the middle of my testing.
For the OP's lens, I would suggest removing/replacing the lens redoing the AF adjustment and see if he same value is determined. Do this about three times and if the 20 is the value, go for it.
@ironheart i was as close as i could get so that it would auto focus.
The always cheaper Sigma lenses allow not less than 4 different distances at 4 different focal lengths, if it's a zoom. A nightmare to do but after that it's a paradise to use. I feel definitely on the safer side with those lenses.
But what I did see happen, were different AF adjustment values for different distances (and in case the lens in question is a zoom, also at different focal lengths).
Sometimes I wonder, with all our knowledge about what can go wrong and what can influence focus, how we ever get sharp pictures 8-| In any case, I will stick to AFMA wide open and let the focus shift do it's shameless work. Wide open to me is critical - if I miss sharpness wide open, the picture is wasted for sure. If there's already a huge DoF, I don't care that much baout the most precise focusing and in the rare cases I do, I'd use LiveView anyway.
1) The image gets less sharp.
2) DOF decreases
3) The distance of the "sharpest" part changes slightly.
4) Aberration at the edges of the frame are more apparent (comatic and chromatic)
It is the 3rd factor that is the focus shifting.
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
@funtagraph: Yes.
The AF module isn't calculating that function so in theory I can adjust my lens to be perfect sharp in 3 meters distance at f/1.4 but if I close the aperture to f/8, the perfect spot lies a t 3.25 meters. Although this drift can be measured, it is not very visible to the eye (here I can be wrong, I think) due to increasing DoF.
I guess, FoCal as a tool for AFMA can also do a test run for focus shift and if I get curious enough, maybe I will kill some time with it - but I'm a little afraid, too much "knowledge, what can go worng" will lead to too much pictures going wrong.
I usually AF Fine Tune at about ten feet with lenses up to 135mm, then recheck at three feet as this is atypical subject distance for me. IMO, focus shift has not been seen as a problem for me.
Field curvature is the location of objects that are in focus. They are on the a virtual curved surface. its like you are in a big balloon focused on the "wall" which is the inner surface of the balloon which is curved.
Focus shift is for any given point object that is in focus, it is represented by a line perpendicular to the sensor where the object is actually in focus. each point on that line relates to a "ring" on the surface of the lense (made up of a bunch of concentric circles) so as the aperture closes more of the dots disappear. since the larger aperture "rings" contribute to more of the light it overpowers the point of light that is in the center(smaller aperture). So the apparent place that in "focus" can change from larger aperture to smaller aperture. Note DOF is a separate factor and not really related.
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
Nasim does a good job explaining (as usual):
https://photographylife.com/what-is-focus-shift