I am headed out with some friends and we are going to see what we can get.
||COOLPIX 5000|●|D70|●|D700|●|D810|●|AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED|●|AF Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D|●|AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D|●|AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G|●|AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D|●|AF-S Micro Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED|●|AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED (Silver)|●|AF-S Teleconverter TC-20E III|●|PB-6 Bellows|●|EL-NIKKOR 50mm f/2.8||
Comments
Edit: Just got home from my day job and I have to head out again early tomorrow. Maybe this weekend if it's still going on.
But I dont know where to look(besides up) and I am in the southern hemisphere so ....
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/weather/2015/08/11/how-watch-perseid-meteor-shower/31467383/
and how to photograph it
http://www.slrlounge.com/perseid-meteor-shower-2015-how-to-photograph/
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
@Parke1953: Thanks for that, makes me feel much better!
Wow, that slrlounge article is basic.
Rather frustratingly this is a setup shot, I have lot of shots after this with much better composition and finer focus...but no bloody meteors in ! D810 and 24-70 at 2.8 - wish I had the 14-24 or 20mm 1.8 for this kind of work.
"The f/ratio or lens speed is usually written on the lens as a ratio (for example, f/2.8), and represents the focal length divided by the aperture. The f/ratio can be a difficult concept for new photographers, but what it means in meteor photography is this: with a faster lens you will capture fainter meteors. If the f/ratio is too high, you will miss most meteors. Ideally you want something in the < f/2.0 range. I have been successful with lenses up to f/2.8, but in my experience, once you go above f/3.0, your prospects of catching meteors rapidly diminish. There is nothing more frustrating than watching a meteor fly through your field of view only to check the camera and find out that the meteor was not imaged!"
The important point he didn't follow through on is the number which is the focal length divided by the maximum aperture is the important number. The larger this number, the better. HOWEVER this has to be balanced by the focal length of the lens. An 80mm f1.2 would give you a magnificent number 57 which is bigger than a 24mm f1.4 (17), a 14mm f2.8 (5), a 20mm f1.8 (11) and the 35mm f1.4 (25). Obviously you want the fov of the 14mm with the highest number but that isn't going to happen. The usually chosen lens is a 24mm but IME the coma of lenses wider than 35mm is too much so I have chosen to stitch two or more images with a 35mm f1.4.
I find these simple/bad technique articles are irritating as these people are treated like gods by so many people whereas all they actually are, are effective 'bloggers' who rely on the lack of knowledge of their readers.
Rant off.
There is a heck of a lot more to good nightscape photography than that, I am on a steep learning curve and still near the bottom because of the lack of dark skies in the UK.
For all that, I got a couple hundred of photo's of the milky way that exceeded my expectations (for the East Coast of the United States) which is heavily light polluted, and maybe 3 photo's with shooting stars in them (even at 14mm).
Outside of the 3 photo's with shooting stars in them, I saw around 90 shooting stars while I was setup with my friend and 4 Nikons' clicking away on tripods.
I was using my D7100 and the Tokina 11-16 which had the highest rating light gathering from the list on Lonely speck pages. I had a heck of a time getting sharp focus at f2.8 live view 100%. I would pick the brightest star closest to center of the image and make the star as small and sharp as possible. I ended up at 15 sec time and still had small trials and hazy images. I will try again when I do not have an early call the next morning. R
Managed to get a shot with 2 shooting stars (and a little bit of a third). The aurora borealis showed up as well...
https://www.dropbox.com/s/e233zrwgfwgzxa1/DSC_3565.jpg?dl=0