I have a "touch" of OCD, and if I spot a single fingerprint on my lens filter, I will literally spend minutes, if not tens of minutes, getting it cleaned off. I may even stop what I am doing, cleaning the filter to a spotless state, and then go on. If it is not easily cleaned off using my lens-pen, I will pull out the Leica cleaning cloth and go to mattresses on that f.....
So, am I crazy? Probably yes, but does a single fingerprint on a filter matter at all?
Comments
It may induce glare or loss of contrast if there s a strong light source in or closely outside the frame.
Get some residue less fluid and a cleaned (but not worn) 100% cotton soft t shirt (no printing).
Always blow or brush off dust first, as the dust may be hard and scratch if rubbed.
Nikon N90s, F100, F, lots of Leica M digital and film stuff.
That being said, I don't really notice a huge difference in image quality, even though it's fairly dirty.
In several years I have cleaned the front of my 400 only once or twice, usually after being at the beach or shooting in the rain.
And, I have just finished some shots at a dirt race track, but fortunately the track was so over watered by the heavy rains we have been experiencing , the dust was very low up in row 46.
Small specks on the front filter do not bother me. However, as I do use a protective filter in most cases, I have been know to use a shirt tail after breathing on the front filter.....not recommended, but oh well...
My final conclusion is that if a chemical, i.e., ocean spray with salt, actual pieces of a wind blown foreign material such as dirt or mud, or a finger print with who knows what in it, is present I will attempt to clean this off because I think it will damage the coating on the lens or filter. Big spots will most likely create some degradation of IQ, IMO.