I see this camera avaliable with this description I am thinking it has sand inside the body and viewfinder. What's your thoughts? Worth $450 Canadian.
Tried to get it replaced for the oil damage recall on the model but Nikon refuses and says that the sand the found on the camera is the reason they won’t. Camera works perfectly as is. Only problem is when you take pictures of pure white you can see spots around the sensor at f1.8 the most. At f6 you pretty much see nothing. Only seen on white background things but just lower the f stop and it won’t be a problem.
I saw that ad about a month ago, wouldn't touch it will a ten foot pole, likely needs a new sensor and other parts. Just buy one for $800-900 and save yourself the trouble, since sand in electrics is bad news.
Post edited by PB_PM on
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
I did purchase it was wishful hoping that it just needs a sensor clean, but the owner probably knows it needs a new sensor and lied about it. Guess I will find out might be a big paper weight...
Yeah, replacing the shutter mechanism is more than the camera is worth at this point, since I suspect you'd be looking to pay as much for that work as you did for the camera.
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
If the purchase was through ebay, file a buyer protection complain, see if ebay can push the seller for a return by telling them that the seller grossly misrepresented the item's condition if it applies.
If you complain to e bay they will immediately remove the money from the sellers account and usually favour the buyer....So make your complaint and get it off to Nikon ..you can cancel the complaint if it comes back OK
If the seller disclosed that there were issues and sold it ‘as is’, the buyer has no one to blame but themselves. If it is indeed the same camera I saw on eBay a while ago (the price matches, as does the discription), then all this information of the sand in the camera was disclosed by the seller. In which case, buyer protection won’t help you.
Post edited by PB_PM on
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
If the seller disclosed that there were issues and sold it ‘as is’, the buyer has no one to blame but themselves. If it is indeed the same camera I saw on eBay a while ago (the price matches, as does the discription), then all this information of the sand in the camera was disclosed by the seller. In which case, buyer protection won’t help you.
That’s technically true but eBay is notorious for siding with buyers in virtually all circumstances. I’d say there’s a very good chance the OP could return the camera for a refund, at least.
null
Actually there was no disclosure on sand in the camera just on the outside. They also said they are not sure if it is dust of oil on the sensor...
If you use PayPal for payment, just bypass Ebay return, and open a case in the PayPal resolution center....why? You have 180 days to return and PayPal will side with you unless the listing was sold as "for parts or not working" Ebay's customer service speed is glacial.
Mine look like that every two weeks or so and I just clean the sensors and they are good to go. It doesn't look like sand to me, sand would be bigger and probably a few clumps and would be seen way before f22.
Cleaning the sensor is stupidly simple, buy a few supplies for the cost of sending it in once and it will last you for years. I'm about 1/2 way through my first batch of supplies and its been almost 6 years and 5 cameras, cleaned at least once a month.
Comments
Actually there was no disclosure on sand in the camera just on the outside. They also said they are not sure if it is dust of oil on the sensor...
F2.8 https://flic.kr/p/PgxeAY
F22 https://flic.kr/p/PgxdFm
F1.8 https://flic.kr/p/2a3FRXK
Cleaning the sensor is stupidly simple, buy a few supplies for the cost of sending it in once and it will last you for years. I'm about 1/2 way through my first batch of supplies and its been almost 6 years and 5 cameras, cleaned at least once a month.