There was a thread with the same title on the old forum so I thought I would restart it here:
Something I have learned this week on this forum that I was staggered by is that f numbers are not standardised by the amount of light they let through. I would have expected f2.8 to be different diameters on different lenses but defined so that you could take your 18-105mm f3-5-5.6 and your 35mm f1.8 and when set at the same aperture and ISO, you would see the same shutter speed. Turns out I was wrong. Can see why aperture is not standardised by light, even if somebody explains it I will still not think that it makes sense for the reason stated above, but there ya go - never too old to learn!
Some points raised here are like 'DX doesn't have more reach - it is a cropped sensor' are just pointless to sweat over. Those who say DX magnifies the image or has more reach do understand the
effective difference between DX/FX so what the heck, but that aperture point was a 'What? Wow!' moment for me. 40 years of taking snaps and I didn't know and would never have even suspected that.
">
Always learning.
Comments
Also, I have learned the persistence of the spammers...hopefully rarely seen on the forum live now...
The more I learn the more I find I need. It seems to be a vicious cycle like that. So many toys so little money. :-)
But why writes this editor the word - Always - with a capital lettre?
Well, among other things, it can be quite challenging to get the picture in my mind to correspond to the pixels on my sensor.
Or later today .. after all I just woke up :-)
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
The advice and recommendations from everyone are all worth listening to. Everyone has a different opinion, so it is well worth taking a little advice from everyone. As Dredden85 says, we have a great Nikon family here that we should all be proud of, sometimes we don't all see eye to eye, but it would be boring if we did.
I would personally like to thank
Msmoto Thanks for the advice and motor sport inspiration
adamz Thanks for your advice on lenses.
severncrossing Thanks for your buying advice
obajoba For grounding me when I got confused
Coastalcon For your advice on settings
These are just a few of the many people that deserve thanks. But thanks to everyone that has helped on my buying choices. My wife has even said that my photos of her look better.
Great site and NR family (Now I must learn to keep my posts to the point
Must ask peter how to hide threads on here - too much incriminating evidence now.... )
Edit: But after tests, not a very great one it seems.........
http://newswatch.nationalgeographic.com/2013/06/26/emperor-of-the-image-remembering-national-geographics-robert-gilka/
Many of us "grew up" with National Geographic as our benchmark for good imaging reportage. And it is no different today....we still have some extremely talented photographers doing what few of us can do...here was one of the leaders in setting up the high standards of a good professional.
Enjoy the article, shed a tear, and aspire to be the best...
The Nikon Df and the discussions on "pure photography" have precipitated some thinking in me. I have just ordered prints from a company which fuses inks into aluminum, the end result being stunning. The potential for some very impressive images is even better now that I have seen these, as they appear almost as brilliant as one's monitor.
So, maybe I need to do more thinking about the final goal of what I am shooting rather than just grab my snapshots like I usually do. I suspect many of us will shoot the image within a few minutes of arriving on the scene, and in many cases this must be done, particularly if the subject is dynamic. But, there may be some advantage to more consideration when doing our work.
Thus, what I have learned as a result of recent topics on NRF is to maybe spend more time on one subject and really attempt to get a great result rather than my casual approach. Thank you all.
More importantly, I am learning about me and my own limitations.
Funny how we often want to blame the camera or flash or some other fantasy in our minds, for a crappy shot,
when it is us that needs to be tuned up.
Practiced practice practice, will make us all better photographers.
Having better instruction goes a long way too, in improving one's skill level.
And not just by Acquiring rather expensive cameras and lenses. Then Hoping for the best outcome.
The more I learn here, the more I realize how little I actually know about this hobby.
It's sure fun learning, and relearning forgotten lessons. I thank you all...
SB-910~WG-AS3, SB-50, ME-1, Lexar Professional 600x 64GB SDXC UHS-I 90MB/s* x2, 400x 32GB SDHC UHS-I 60MB/s* x1
Vanguard ALTA PRO 263AT, GH-300T, SBH-250, SBH-100, PH-22 Panhead
Lowepro S&F Deluxe Technical Belt and Harness ~ Pouch 60 AW 50 AW & 10, S&F Toploader 70 AW, Lens Case 11 x 26cm
FE, NIKKOR 2-20mm f/1.8, OPTEX UV 52mm, Vivitar Zoom 285, Kodacolor VR 1000 CF 135-24 EXP DX 35mm, rePlay XD1080
spot on
There are some here, who been at this game, far longer than we care to admit, who are still learning
And there is a great Fall Promo until mid December.
Here's a review of one model, which comes with the pistol grip ball head that I have on mine.
http://www.photographytalk.com/photography-equipment-reviews/3171-vanguard-abeo-pro-283cgh-the-advanced-pro-tripod-you-always-wished-you-owned
They have many models to suit the most demanding photographer, or amateur shooter alike.
SB-910~WG-AS3, SB-50, ME-1, Lexar Professional 600x 64GB SDXC UHS-I 90MB/s* x2, 400x 32GB SDHC UHS-I 60MB/s* x1
Vanguard ALTA PRO 263AT, GH-300T, SBH-250, SBH-100, PH-22 Panhead
Lowepro S&F Deluxe Technical Belt and Harness ~ Pouch 60 AW 50 AW & 10, S&F Toploader 70 AW, Lens Case 11 x 26cm
FE, NIKKOR 2-20mm f/1.8, OPTEX UV 52mm, Vivitar Zoom 285, Kodacolor VR 1000 CF 135-24 EXP DX 35mm, rePlay XD1080