I think it is time for us to start a nice healthy discussion regarding this new lens by Sigma. Please share your thoughts.
As for me I'm very pleased to see that, specially in the world of DX, Sigma is stepping up and offering a very nice fast wide-angle lens; moreover, a lens that has a constant aperture of 1.8...a feature that is not even available in FX/FF line of lenses. If the price is right and it performs within the same caliber of the Sigma 35 1.4...this is going to be hot selling item. I'm really looking forward in seeing some shots from this lens in full res.
Oooh and it looks very sexy to
Post edited by Golf007sd on
D4 & D7000 | Nikon Holy Trinity Set + 105 2.8 Mico + 200 F2 VR II | 300 2.8G VR II, 10.5 Fish-eye, 24 & 50 1.4G, 35 & 85 1.8G, 18-200 3.5-5.6 VR I SB-400 & 700 | TC 1.4E III, 1.7 & 2.0E III, 1.7 | Sigma 35 & 50 1.4 DG HSM | RRS Ballhead & Tripods Gear | Gitzo Monopod | Lowepro Gear | HDR via Promote Control System |
For me it's just "the thing" as standard lens for D7100 - I'm fast wide-angle fan. My experience with 35/1.4 justifies a preorder, what I just did. Given the long term waiting for the USB dock, I think, I can save enough in 2-3 months to get it
Now I enter the sweet phase of looking happily forward to it.
I personally don't like the last generation sigmas ( before the art series ). The art series looks nice, but rather, i'm more interested in the response from Nikon
I'm simply thinking: They set their own benchmark very high with the 35, the 30 appears already to be a good DX lens. Although I wait with cheering for some trustful tests instead the youTube "first hand" whatsoever vids as some produce a lot of hot air and close to none helpful information.
Sigma has done some interesting products and with the USB-dock something very new. The specs of this lens now contain also very interesting facts, it looks very nice and I know, how careful and cleverly designed the lens caps and hood are compared to Nikon's "good enough" ones. I'm very pleased about the color rendering and the transmission rate of the 35 and I'm always happy to mount it because it's great to use. If they do something similar with that one: what could I want more?
Looking at the MTFs it's not the 35mm 1.4 at all - Not bad though all considering. Really heavy vignetting open which is not great for much. Max f-stop is f16 which tells me they (as a new Sigma usual) pushed the "optimum" down to open it up and I'm willing to bet diffraction will start around f8 if not lower. That is not good for landscape wide angles. That is all I can see from what they announced. Could be a interesting tool for DXrs especially those who shoot concerts and the like.
Has there been a recent change of management at Sigma? because rightly or wrongly, I had made the conscious decision to only buy Nikkor glass, now it seems however that their recent offerings are genuinely great value (when compared to OEM equipment, and can hold their own, and in some instances surpass in the image quality stakes. What's changed? Why have they not produced glass like this till recently? I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but I'd actually quite like their new 120-300mm f2.8!
D3s's D700 F100 / Trinity 2.8 Zooms & 1.4 Primes / 105 micro. SB900s with Pocket Wizard Flex TT5 / Mini TT1s. Camranger remote control system.
Has there been a recent change of management at Sigma? ... What's changed? Why have they not produced glass like this till recently? I never thought I'd hear myself say this, but I'd actually quite like their new 120-300mm f2.8!
Yes there was. The founder/CEO passed away in the last two years and there is a new CEO. In his first address to the media he said they would move towards this direction making higher end optics. Obviously lens design takes longer than this to create, but if I recall correctly, he has been in a position to push the company in this direction for about 4 years now. It's fun to see more affordable higher end options are growing for the industry. It can only help hold back the speed that OEM lenses are increasing in price.
@SkintBrit "because rightly or wrongly, I had made the conscious decision to only buy Nikkor glass" Me too, and over the years, that has served me wrong. But there has been the occasional piece of good glass that has been spectacular.
To me, this means that Nikon needs to get it's corporate head out of it's corporate rear end and make competitive products that work great at great prices or it will go the way of companies that made great products but could keep up.
@NSXTypeR "No love for us DX users" Nikon, IMHO, seems to want to throw a few kit lenses and older lenses at DX users. It's a bum's rush - we have no love anymore, there's nothing there for us to buy.
@TTJ, hopefully that's the case (that the cost of lenses will be available and at a lower cost). I'm not sure.
I think NIkon's long game is to drop interchangeable lenses for DX, at least for the more interesting focal lengths, faster, wider, longer, primes, actually any that anyone reading this would really want to buy. The rumors forum might disagree and wish to discuss on a separate thread - it might be premature to discuss now - but my gut tells me that DX will become a 'hobby' format in Nikon's eye, it certainly seems so now - however and whatever that might be described as.
FX is for more serious photographers and what Nikon wants to 'brand' itself for the SLR (although it makes its money with Coolpix - ironic ain't it).
I am hoping for the best. With the D7100 and the soon-to-come D400 Nikon will have two very capable DX sensors just looking for better DX glass. Hopefully, Nikon and third parties will supply them in the next few years.
Just glad that 3rd party lense manufacturers are now taking advantage of the DX format a to produce larger aperture lenses that nikon and Canon are unwilling to do to protect their "Pro" F2.8 FX lenses. .. Hopefully Nikon will start a new line of Pro DX lenses soon.. Say a bunch of F2.0 Zooms ! :-)
Post edited by heartyfisher on
Moments of Light - D610 D7K S5pro 70-200f4 18-200 150f2.8 12-24 18-70 35-70f2.8 : C&C very welcome! Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
Looks great for the DX users that were waiting on a Nikon 24mm 1.8 and owns a 35mm 1.8 Now you can get 1.8 aperture with the convenience of a zoom that has both focal lengths.
Comments
I think the discussion awaits those two points.
My best,
Mike
For me it's just "the thing" as standard lens for D7100 - I'm fast wide-angle fan. My experience with 35/1.4 justifies a preorder, what I just did. Given the long term waiting for the USB dock, I think, I can save enough in 2-3 months to get it
Now I enter the sweet phase of looking happily forward to it.
but rather, i'm more interested in the response from Nikon
D3 • D750 • 14-24mm f2.8 • 35mm f1.4A • PC-E 45mm f2.8 • 50mm f1.8G • AF-D 85mm f1.4 • ZF.2 100mm f2 • 200mm f2 VR2
Sigma has done some interesting products and with the USB-dock something very new. The specs of this lens now contain also very interesting facts, it looks very nice and I know, how careful and cleverly designed the lens caps and hood are compared to Nikon's "good enough" ones. I'm very pleased about the color rendering and the transmission rate of the 35 and I'm always happy to mount it because it's great to use. If they do something similar with that one: what could I want more?
Nikon seriously needs to update the 17-55 2.8 or it will get left in the dust.
No love for us DX users.
@SkintBrit "because rightly or wrongly, I had made the conscious decision to only buy Nikkor glass" Me too, and over the years, that has served me wrong. But there has been the occasional piece of good glass that has been spectacular.
To me, this means that Nikon needs to get it's corporate head out of it's corporate rear end and make competitive products that work great at great prices or it will go the way of companies that made great products but could keep up.
@NSXTypeR "No love for us DX users" Nikon, IMHO, seems to want to throw a few kit lenses and older lenses at DX users. It's a bum's rush - we have no love anymore, there's nothing there for us to buy.
@TTJ, hopefully that's the case (that the cost of lenses will be available and at a lower cost). I'm not sure.
I think NIkon's long game is to drop interchangeable lenses for DX, at least for the more interesting focal lengths, faster, wider, longer, primes, actually any that anyone reading this would really want to buy. The rumors forum might disagree and wish to discuss on a separate thread - it might be premature to discuss now - but my gut tells me that DX will become a 'hobby' format in Nikon's eye, it certainly seems so now - however and whatever that might be described as.
FX is for more serious photographers and what Nikon wants to 'brand' itself for the SLR (although it makes its money with Coolpix - ironic ain't it).
My best,
Mike
D3 • D750 • 14-24mm f2.8 • 35mm f1.4A • PC-E 45mm f2.8 • 50mm f1.8G • AF-D 85mm f1.4 • ZF.2 100mm f2 • 200mm f2 VR2
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
Now you can get 1.8 aperture with the convenience of a zoom that has both focal lengths.
If it was 16-35mm that would have been perfect!
D3100: 18-55
A7II: 16-35 F4, 55 1.8, 70-200 F4