Maybe I'm misunderstanding something about my D810, I assume it has to do with my CF cards. I don't get the advertised buffer capacity of "47" at 12-bit, lossless compressed NEF, with these settings I only get "25", but at compressed I get "28". I'm using a Lexar Pro 800x, UDMA 7 CF card. I tried reformatting the card, switching settings, and even put in a slower no-name brand 600x CF card, and I get the same results. I'm assuming I will only get the larger buffer if I switch the SanDisk Extreme Pro cards, but I wanted to verify before driving myself crazy, because I missed a setting.
He is probably counting how many pictures he can take before the buffer is filled. If the buffer clears more slowly because he is using a slower card, then that number will go down, even though buffer size is not effected.
What is in the second SD card slot? Make sure that is empty then test again. For example, if it is writing to that card too, say you have it set as backup rather than overflow, the buffer only clears as fast as the slower card.
The second card is a Class 10 SDXC, which I have set to overflow and movies. Oddly enough, with the CF card I get the average of 1.3k, while the SD card shows 1.4K, both are 64GB. On my D800, I get 1.4K on both cards.
Are you doing RAW only or RAW+Jpeg? Also what is your noise reduction setting? Anything other than ISO 100 may also reduce your buffer capacity. Page 489-491 in your manual.
Also, the number of files that can be stored on a given card is just an estimate, as the actual file size will vary (also on page 491). Likely the block size of the CF card is different than the SD which will change the estimate slightly. The difference could be 1 shot. 1349 rounds to 1.3k and 1350 rounds to 1.4k
Ironheart, I only shoot in RAW on this camera, I never been a fan of RAW+jpeg, or any other settings, so I can maximize card space, camera performance and battery life. Its something I learned from shooting action sports, but then before I knew better I also shot in jpeg just for the speed not realizing how much of a disservice I was doing to my files looking at them years later. But to answer your question the NR is off.
All of those will reduce your buffer size. Just for grins set it to 100 and see what the buffer count says. Auto ISO for sure will affect this due to the non-integral ISO values selected (I.e. anything that isn't 100, 200, 400, 800, 1600, etc...).
Thats what it shows, but I will say based on the shoot I did last week, while shooting the buffer ran out after "28" shots while only shooting 3FPS. The shot was done with an 800x card. Once I hit zero, it crawled till it stop shooting while maybe doing about 1FPS till I let the buffer refresh itself.
Indeed it does. Also check your file sizes, high ISO shots are larger than low ISO ones.
But would it effect the buffer size to the extent of which his has which is significant. He's getting half of what he should be approximately getting and all else is setup correctly. My only guess would be that the Lexar card is just not fast enough and you may need the 1066x version.
That seems to be only thing I can think of, I wanted to see what other users are getting to compare. If this is the case, I guess I'll will need to buy another set of faster CF cards.
That just doesn't make sense to me, the CF or SDHC card used in the D800 makes no difference in what the camera displays. The buffer is built into the camera, and has nothing to do with the speed of the card. All the speed of the card does is effect how fast the buffer clears.
Post edited by PB_PM on
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
@PB_PM If this were true, there really wouldn't be a huge need to have fast cards. From what I understand, the CF card makes a huge difference because, in reality, the buffer is only so big and the camera is constantly writing images to disk at the same time it's taking data into the buffer. It's for this reason of the double duty work and limited space that the faster it gets data onto that card, the more it's able to keep up with new images coming in.
There are websites out there which compare the speed of memory cards based on the how many frames from a certain camera they're able to get until they "max" out the buffer (that's when things slow down).
I'm about 90% sure this is how it works, maybe somebody else can back me up here but like I said, I'm nearly certain this is the case and the speed of the card has a dramatic influence on the camera's ability to write images. Let's face it, D810 has to be about the most demanding camera possible on a CF card performance wise with it's big files and (now) relatively fast frame rate of 5fps. Wouldn't shock me if his cards just aren't up to snuff to be able to go as long as he wants.
...in reality, the buffer is only so big and the camera is constantly writing images to disk at the same time it's taking data into the buffer.
Which is exactly what i just said. The size of the buffer has nothing to do with the memory card. Again, the speed of the memory card only affects the speed at which the buffer can clear.
The OP asked why his buffer was not as big as advertised, not whether or not faster cards would make the buffer bigger. CF/SD cards do not make the buffer bigger, no matter what speed or size.
I don't get the advertised buffer capacity of "47" at 12-bit, lossless compressed NEF, with these settings I only get "25", but at compressed I get "28".
Post edited by PB_PM on
If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
A faster CF card will increase the number os shots required to fill the buffer. On my D800 with the largest files, 4fps and fastest cards, that is 16 or 17. However, the first two or three may have cleared the buffer, so there may only be 14 in the buffer at any single moment.
However, something is not right. Keep investigating.
Can it be that you think you are at " 12-bit, lossless compressed NEF " but actually you are not ( some menu items need saving/pressing "DONE" before exiting ) . 28 is what you get at 14 bit compressed, after all ...
Just for giggles, I put in an old 2GB SanDisk Ultra CF (15MB/s), it even showed "28". The crawl is a bit slower. If you're curious I get about estimated 43 shots with card, so I guess if I ever want the feeling of shooting film, I could drop this in for limited shots.
So with this is what I'm getting with three different CF cards: Lexar 800X 64GB = 28 Topram 600X 64GB = 28 Sandisk Ultra 2GB = 28
All of these are done at Raw L, Compressed, 12 bit, with no settings ON, shooting in MANUAL, single point focus, auto white balance.
-------
Paperman, the D-Lighting is off, but with it on its still "28"
I erased the D-Lighting comment but you must have read it before I did . Please re-read ... I am almost sure your settings are at 14 bit compressed ...
Paperman, I'm 100% sure I'm in 12bit, because I go back to the menu it shows 12 bit, but always the photos remaining is 1.3k, if I switch to 14bit it drops to 1.1k.
Comments
What is in the second SD card slot? Make sure that is empty then test again. For example, if it is writing to that card too, say you have it set as backup rather than overflow, the buffer only clears as fast as the slower card.
Also, the number of files that can be stored on a given card is just an estimate, as the actual file size will vary (also on page 491). Likely the block size of the CF card is different than the SD which will change the estimate slightly. The difference could be 1 shot. 1349 rounds to 1.3k and 1350 rounds to 1.4k
I'm sure you're right about the card estimations.
There are websites out there which compare the speed of memory cards based on the how many frames from a certain camera they're able to get until they "max" out the buffer (that's when things slow down).
I'm about 90% sure this is how it works, maybe somebody else can back me up here but like I said, I'm nearly certain this is the case and the speed of the card has a dramatic influence on the camera's ability to write images. Let's face it, D810 has to be about the most demanding camera possible on a CF card performance wise with it's big files and (now) relatively fast frame rate of 5fps. Wouldn't shock me if his cards just aren't up to snuff to be able to go as long as he wants.
The OP asked why his buffer was not as big as advertised, not whether or not faster cards would make the buffer bigger. CF/SD cards do not make the buffer bigger, no matter what speed or size.
However, something is not right. Keep investigating.
So with this is what I'm getting with three different CF cards:
Lexar 800X 64GB = 28
Topram 600X 64GB = 28
Sandisk Ultra 2GB = 28
All of these are done at Raw L, Compressed, 12 bit, with no settings ON, shooting in MANUAL, single point focus, auto white balance.
-------
Paperman, the D-Lighting is off, but with it on its still "28"