So, I use a 200-500mm f5.6 mounted onto a D800. I have played aronud with various settings & currently use AF-C (release & focus), with single point, and the focus tracking lock on switched off. I've tried the other AF-C modes & get crap results with them! Like tonight in the garden. A sparrowhawk flew over - I had the camera on D9 & it hunted all over to find focus, despite the fact that the height of the bird didn't change much. And it was bright & sunny (yes it does happen occasionally in England!). A while ago I got great shots using my usual settings.
Recently I've been trying to photograph BIF, like a kingfisher flying across the water. Or hirundines flycatching. Most images are not sharp, even with 1/2000s & me panning (I have to to get focus). I had a similar (lack of) success rate with the 300mm f4.
So: Am I being deluded in what I'm trying? Is my technique p1$$ poor? (I guees you have to pan at exactly the same speed as the bird is moving; otherwise any relative motion will blur things).
Why can't I get d9, d21, d51, Auto or 3-D to work fast enough? Others swear my them-allegedly.
Do I need a better camera & lens (not happening for some time)?
I'm trying something easier this weekend - motorbikes
Bigger & not so erratic-usually.
Help
Comments
If you want to really get frustrated, try to track bees or hummingbirds
Settings here are:
AF-C 25-point dynamic
Also, don't expect 100% hit rate. With bees and hummingbirds I hope for 75%
Should the VR be set to Normal or Sport (if used)? I wondered about that after shooting the last airshow too.
Backlight hurts, low contrast hurts, with a 5.6 lens low light hurts.
framer
You said most of your images are not sharp with either the 200-500 or the 300f4. Are they sharp on a static object? It could be that your particular D800's telephoto AF system is front or back focusing. Also, what ISO are you reaching with the 1/2000s exposures? Are you using VR? The old 300f4 is VR free and should be sharper than the 200-500, but I was not sure which version you tried and got soft results with, so perhaps you could clarify that. If your ISO is reasonable (e.g. 100-400) you could try shooting on manual and boosting the aperture (e.g. shoot at f8 on the 200-500 or at 5.6 on the 300f4); the added depth of field should help correct small errors in focus acquisition. Lastly, post some trouble pics and some pics that are sharp along with the details of the shots. The folks here are tons smarter than me and just by looking at the pics can often tell you what needs to be fixed
@coastalconn - I've set it as you suggested & tried d9 & d21. But really only had bigger birds today. Do you unlock the focus point on the back of the camera?
If it's locked, does that mean you only have 1 focus point irrespective of how many you set?
Select manual mode on camera, set auto iso,
Set aperture to f8 and shutter to 1/2500
If not enough light ( iso 1250+ ) go to f8 and shutter to 1/1250
If still not enough light ( iso 1250+ ) Then f5.6 1/500.
This does depend on bird, something like an eagle that doesn't beat it wings very fast can have a much lower shutter speed
Method 1. Used when there is a busy, low contrast background, and the bird is flying towards/angled
Your center single point is the most sensitive and best aligned.
AF lock on medium.
Continous high burst.
Fire on release.
Single point,
Use a point on the ground at correct range to prefocus
When you see the bird, get the centre point over the bird and use back button autofocus to lock it, and fire off a burst, with back button pressed on, ( if you don't lock, but get the background, keep bumping back button autofocus button untill locked )
As soon as you are not tracking it after a burst, release back button AF and then then get back on it when the bird is centered again to "bump" the autofocus then repeat.
If the Bird is moving parralel to you, when you have lock, take your finger off the back button.
You can use same technique with group point autofocus. and some people like to add the 9 points around the centre point for tracking.
I *personally* prefer just using group or single.
Method 2. Used for birds in the sky or a very clean background. Usually you will need +0.7 to 1 +EV
AF lock on long
Continous high burst.
Fire release and then focus
3D tracking on.
Easy as pie this one, once you have the bird locked 3D tracking will follow it around the frame.
Method 3. Manual, best used where you can predict the path of the bird.
Manual focus
Continous high burst.
Fire on release.
Single point,
Prefocus on where the birds will be, and fire a burst of shots as it passes that point.
As you can see, somthing like a D5 is the perfect tool, and somehting like the d800 is not a great tool, FPS is too low and focus system not up to it. which is why so many people use the big prime lenses and pro body.
I still persist in using my d810 and D7100 as they have other uses !
https://flic.kr/p/yvsK7k
https://flic.kr/p/LQZv7q
https://flic.kr/p/yvsKaX
https://flic.kr/p/wCtLJQ
https://flic.kr/p/uQtrZV
Shooting BIF is an art, not a science. It requires practice and patience. @Nikoniser has described what works for him, but you may find something else. For instance, I like to set a1: AF-C Priority Selection to focus rather than release, sometimes, esp with slower moving prey, err targets.
@Nikoniser
Personally I will not go below 1/1250th and that is only in the dark and emergency. I generally shoot in the 1/2500-1/4000th range.
In method 1, the OP has a D800 so there is no group mode. The advantage of using the Dynamic modes is it will stay on the bird better, and assuming the OP is talking about birds at a distance, I don't think he is trying to get the single point on the eye. Also I would never suggest to someone to disengage AF-On with a bird moving parallel to you. The distance is constantly changing unless you are moving parallel at the same time.
I personally wouldn't suggest method three.
Its the only way to get certain birds. With a 300mm at f8 you have quite a big "chunk" of DOF and just bumping AF on to get lock and then spraying for 2 second will get you 2-3 in focus shots, and you have no chance of holding the point on the bird for the full 2 seconds.
"I personally wouldn't suggest method three."
Almost every kingfisher in flight shot you have ever seen has been made with that technique.
"Its the only way to get certain birds. With a 300mm at f8 you have quite a big "chunk" of DOF and just bumping AF on to get lock and then spraying for 2 second will get you 2-3 in focus shots, and you have no chance of holding the point on the bird for the full 2 seconds. "
Not sure exactly what you are shooting with, but if you only get 2 or 3 in 2 seconds, something seems quite off. On a parallel flying bird relatively close, I get like 19/20 sharp with my D500 with AF-On engaged. I would expect on any modern Nikon camera to get at least 80% sharp on a easy bird. I also would never shoot a 300 at F8, I might stop down to F3.5 on my 300 F2.8. I never really stopped down beyond F4.5 with my 300 F4.
The OP is having a hard time tracking birds with AF, to sugest trying Manual focus probably isn't the best solution. All of my KF shots are AF, btw..
But like Ironheart said, we all shoot differently..
I purchased a D800 after the focusing issue was fixed. I wanted one right away due to the enormity of improvement the D800 presented over previous FF models, but felt compelled to wait until the bugs were out.
I am in the Midwest and am blessed to be close to the Mississippi River, so wintertime bald eagle shooting is a passion.
Eagles are somewhat predictable in their descent towards their targeted fish, especially when it is a floating, dead fish. An eagle approaching a dead fish floating on the water is fairly easy to follow, in fact much easier than the birds you are trying (I still don't have a decent kingfisher in flight image).
As far as equipment, I was using a 500mm F4 and 300mm 2.8 (both AFSII models - can't afford the newest lenses as a hobbyist). I tried ever conceivable setting (AFC 9, 21, 3D etc etc) focus tracking at off, 1-5, rear focus button, AF fine tuning. You name it, I tried it.
I would end up with OOF shots at the beginning of the eagle's approach, one or two in focus during descent but more often than not, the money shot (the explosion on the water) would be OOF. My in focus shots were often book-ended by OOF shots. Extremely frustrating. Keep in mind, on an average day on the water I would fire 2500-3000 frames, so this was not a casual experience. Multiply that by 10-20 trips a winter and we're talking significant frame count. I tried it all.
Without going into everything I tried to improve my keeper rate let me cut to the chase - the D800 was never intended to be a BIF camera.
I purchased the D810 after reading a few reviews subsequent to its release. Couldn't wait to get out to the river with it. With the same technique and lenses used on the D800, my keeper rate went up exponentially. In a series of 10-12 approach shots, I was now getting 50-75% or more in focus. I really thought that was outstanding until I visited the Canadian Raptor Conservancy this spring and attempted to keep up with flying owls and hawks with the D810. It couldn't keep focus on these fast moving raptors at close distance. A buddy with me had the (new at the time) D500. He nailed everything. I now have a D500 and can tell you that it is nothing short of amazing. Focus seems to slam in on subjects and lock in. Can't wait to "eagle" with it this winter.
The D800 is a great camera for landscape and stills. I am not saying great BIF and other action shots can't be had with it (I have some outstanding action images from the camera), BUT, the keeper rate will be compromised by the camera's design and subsequent performance. Even with fast lenses, the camera's processing system lags behind. The D800 shines on a tripod shooting a landscape (although I recommend mirror up because the 800/e mirror slap is quite extreme). However, as great a camera as the D810 is (significant improvements from d800 and definitely worth the upgrade) I may not use it much for BIF anymore because the D500 focus acquisition, lock and tracking is just that good. I will, however, reach for it as my #1 for more static wildlife shots.
Since you have said changing gear is not an option right now, I'll offer a few tips that helped me with the d800 and BIF. Get to know the rear focus button and use it. The other thing that helped me was locking onto the birds (with rear focus button) IN ADVANCE of when you want to actually engage the shutter. The D800 is a slow mover for BIF focus acquisition, so helping it out by allowing it to "pre-focus" may be of help to you. Auto ISO slows frame rate. This killed me early on. I can't speak for the 200-500, but VR can slow things down too. You don't need it with high shutter speeds. Turn it off. I use LensAlign and can tell you that my D800 was all across the board. Some lenses +15 or more, others -10, still others 0. I can tell you that the cameras I have purchased after the D800 (d7200, d810 and d500) are 0 or within 5 +/- with all my lenses. If you haven't fine tuned the D800 at length, consider doing so. One more thing - AFC on the D800/e should only be used for objects that are moving. Use AFS for birds in trees or slow moving 4 legged animals. Just keep refocusing if need be. AFC on the D800/e tends to chatter. This was greatly improved on the 810/7200/500 and I have had great success even with perched birds (with these newer bodies) when I forget to change from AFC to AFS.
I hope I have helped and apologize for what is probably the longest first post on NR.
I also have some static shots at the same ISO