Rectilinear, I mean. Small and WITH AF. Even if I get that it's not smart for Nikon to make one, why don't the other ones do it? I mean, judging by the clamoring on the internet (and my own sense of unfulfillment), that would make sense.
Is it technically hard?
Comments
https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/981707-REG/rokinon_16maf_n_16mm_f2_0_ultra_wide_abngle.html
No AF, and it's big and heavy. Fuji has a 16mm 1.4. Kinda big and heavy, but a 2.0 should be smaller and lighter, right? Or not?
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
oh back to the topic at hand ... what was I wanting to say ? oh yeah .. I am not a wide-angle shooter so DX suites me so well at the moment .. but I feel ya, if was a widey it would be a bit of a pain... still the new Tokina 14-20 F2 is nice :-) I have my eye on it.. but then I remember I am not a widey .. sigh :-)
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.