In other threads about buffers and card speed, the question came into my head about whether the card would be able to transfer files quicker if it were formatted after each shoot. I format the card immediately after downloading the RAW files to my accessory hard drive connected to my MacBook. I do not have problems with any issues with the buffer although on some long exposures i can see the green light on the back of the D4 stay lighted for a period of a second or two after the exposure is completed.
Thus, my question is whether just deleting the images is less efficient than reformatting the card after each shoot. I do have an opinion but would like to hear what others have to say.
Msmoto, mod
Comments
Oh, EDIT: I just read on a thread here that not formatting can give problems, one of the guys buffer capacity was greatly reduced and that was cured by formatting.
Yeah, after my experience with the buffer problems, I will stick to formatting from now on, too. In fact, I've never formatted my cards until now, only always deleted the pictures. Makes much more sense to really keep it clean like that.
@Golf007sd: Thanks for this hint! Yes, it appears to be very basic, and I wouldn't call myself illiterate with my camera, but it's one of these things I've never realized (although the symbols are printed in red...) :-)
I usually do that for a new shoot or when I feel like it though. Mostly it happens when the card fills up.
I think you should format the card too if you're going from one model of camera to another if you have multiple bodies.
I was unaware that a card had a limited number of write cycles to be concerned about... as my research suggested about 10,000 up to 100,000 write cycles which is more than I will ever get to I would think.... Thanks, all...
Write cycles for flash memory cells are in fact finite, but life is in 10's of thousands of cycles. Even if formatting fully writes the card (which it does not) you would have to do this 10 times a day for 10 years to significantly stress it.
Formatting also re-serializes free space which can become fragmented in delete / fill cycles.
Flash cards use the FAT32 file system which has a very delicate directory structure. Formatting re-builds it.
Most cards that are 'unreadable', actually have no problems in storage, but have corrupted directories, that is why recovery software works.
Re-formatting at each fresh use is safest.
Regards .... H
Nikon N90s, F100, F, lots of Leica M digital and film stuff.
@spraynpray: Great point. Once the images are off my memory card, it gets formatted before he next image is recorded.
I know some of you folk are professionals. Would you choke on $16 or $32 worth of film for a wedding?
@spraynpray. Nothing against Lightroom. I've heard of it, but have never used it. But I have a mental block against using special purpose software for file management. I prefer to do that with the standard OS tools available on the PC, be it a Mac, Windows or Linux box.
@haroldp. "formatting only writes directory entries and block headers" True. Mostly. It depends on the system you are using and how you are formatting the card.
Ironically, the XQD card which is what I like to use is now down to about $60 for 16GB. Originally I think it was about 2 - 3 times that much.....and I have two of them....LOL )
Nikon N90s, F100, F, lots of Leica M digital and film stuff.
From what I understand that is the best way to do it. Doing it with a PC or Mac can actually make the card slower or shorten it's lifetime sometimes.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SD_card#Risks_of_reformatting
"Reformatting an SD card with a different file system, or even with the same one, may make the card slower, or shorten its lifespan. Some cards use wear leveling, in which frequently modified blocks are mapped to different portions of memory at different times, and some wear-leveling algorithms are designed for the access patterns typical of the file allocation table on a FAT12, FAT16 or FAT32 device.[70] In addition, the preformatted file system may use a cluster size that matches the erase region of the physical memory on the card; reformatting may change the cluster size and make writes less efficient.
SD/SDHC/SDXC memory cards have a "Protected Area" on the card for the SD standard's security function; a standard formatter may erase it, causing problems if security is used. The SD Association provides free SD Formatter software to overcome these problems.[71] The SD Formatter does not format the "Protected Area", and the Association recommends the use of appropriate application software or SD-compatible device that provides SD security function to format the "Protected Area" in the memory card."
I really wish they would ditch the FAT12, FAT16, FAT32 & especially exFAT file systems.
UDF would be a good alternative, it has more features & it can be read on almost any computer platform.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems
It might have problems for transferring photos to tablets or phones though. But that's something that could be solved with a simple OS update.
p.s. This is the SD Card Association's official formatter. Which won't shorten a cards life or slow it's speed.
https://www.sdcard.org/downloads/formatter_4/
"Memory cards must be formatted before first use or after being used or formatted in other devices."
I suspect the process makes certain the card is correct for each camera body and there is also some information placed on the card by the camera after it is formatted to allow your computer to identify it.
Not sure if these are real deals, but I got an email from Adorama this morning about SanDisk UDMA cards being on sale; 16GB for $60.
http://www.adorama.com/IDSCF16GEP90.html?EmailPrice=T
Amazon seems to have similar sales, but I know nothing regarding how the specs affects price. YMMV.
Denver Shooter