I put together a round up of what I consider to be the best wide angle lenses in 2016:
http://www.shotkit.com/best-wide-angle-lens/ I wanted to see if you agreed with my choices, and if I've made any glaring omissions, please let me know. Also if any of you have any great images taken with the Nikon 10-24 f/3.5 - 4.5 and would like to have them featured, do let me know :-)
Cheers
Comments
For primes I'm pretty happy with my 20mm f/1.8G
Many folks swear by the samyang 14mm, even though it is manual focus, for both astrophotography and events. Our own @Pistnbroke uses it at weddings if I'm not mistaken.
Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.
Filters I use the Fotodiox 145 system mainly for the polariser Filter.
https://flic.kr/p/fXMMHA
I'm a user of the DX 12-24/F4, and love it. Have posted these links previously, but hey, whatcha, my story is still the same about this lens.
1. Cycle race start, panning, slow shutter, SB-400 flash, 12-24/f4 lens @12mm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68039985@N08/7762824812/in/photostream/
2. Olive & peach prunings, tripod, 12-24/f4 lens @12mm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68039985@N08/7722265110/in/photostream/
3. Small room, monopod, 12-24/f4 lens @12mm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68039985@N08/6834722634/in/photostream/
4. Archaic French car, handheld, 12-24/f4 lens @12mm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68039985@N08/6281707721/in/photostream/
5. Peugeot 404, handheld, 12-24/f4 lens @12mm
http://www.flickr.com/photos/68039985@N08/6281707859/in/photostream/
Mick
" alt="" />
I also have a Sigma 8mm f/3.5 Cir Fish, which I like to have fun with. It's pretty useless for other things, but for fun, it's great.
For landscapes the Zeiss 25mm f/2 is awesome.
10-24 @ 10mm f5.6
Denver Shooter
When the 15 is used with the D810, it really is a nice small package.
framer
That said, I use my AIS collection for landscapes at f/5.6 or less. I really doubt any modern lens is much better than those at that f-stop when it comes to sharpness. My big "but" is there can be a lot of ghosting on the 15 and the 14-24 has that controlled really well. However, if someone wanted a landscape set, I would recommend that they seriously consider what I have done with my "core landscape set" below:
20 2.8 AIS
24 2.8 AIS
28 2.8 AIS
40 2.0 Voightlander Ultron
50 1.2 AIS.
Nice and light, small and less than $3k.
Except for the big gaping hole I have between 28 and 40 which I will fix with the 35, this covers 90% of likely landscape shots and half of the remaining 10% is more likely to be shot at longer than 50 - at least in my style.
That lens has zero distortion, it also can be mounted reversed for unbelievable close-up's. @ f/5.6 nothing is sharper IMHO.
I have also done focus stacking when doing panoramic photos with great success with that 28mm lens.
framer