Good travel tripod

135

Comments

  • PB_PMPB_PM Posts: 4,494Member
    You are just comparing Manfrotto products. Not a far comparison at all.

    Manfrotto 055XPROB = 2.4KG (7KG load capacity)
    Gitzo GT3531s = 1.4KG (18KG load capacity)

    Thus, an aluminum tripod that cannot even hold half as much gear, weighs twice as much.
    If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
  • PaRealtorPaRealtor Posts: 95Member
    edited December 2013
    Wow! Didn't know tripods could get so expensive! Glad I read all of your post. Looks like my MeFOTO RoadTrip Convertible Tripod, in Metallic Red should work for a Me!!! #:-S
    Post edited by PaRealtor on
  • PaRealtorPaRealtor Posts: 95Member
    edited December 2013
    I forgot, most of you are REAL photographers.
    Post edited by PaRealtor on
  • PB_PMPB_PM Posts: 4,494Member
    edited December 2013
    I don't think there is a difference between real phot
    Wow! Didn't know tripods could get so expensive! Glad I read all of your post. Looks like my MeFOTO RoadTrip Convertible Tripod, in Metallic Red should work for a Me!!! #:-S
    Photography is an expensive hobby/career. That said there are some items that seem very expensive at first, but more than pay for themselves in the long run. When purchasing gear (camera bodies aside) don't just think of a 1-2 year period, think of the usage over a 5 or 10+ year period. When you look at it long term, buying a high end product today is actually cheaper.
    Post edited by PB_PM on
    If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
  • TaoTeJaredTaoTeJared Posts: 1,306Member
    You are just comparing Manfrotto products. Not a far comparison at all.

    Manfrotto 055XPROB = 2.4KG (7KG load capacity)
    Gitzo GT3531s = 1.4KG (18KG load capacity)

    Thus, an aluminum tripod that cannot even hold half as much gear, weighs twice as much.
    I'm sorry but unless you are shooting a 4x5 field camera, that is quite overkill. Still Gitzo's own series is still not twice as much. Those are huge tripods. And I was trying to illustrate with a product people can afford and see in most camera stores.

    Alum: Gitzo Series 3 3-section Aluminium Tripod = load cap 40lbs weight 7lbs
    CF: Gitzo GT3531s = load cap 40lbs weight 4.7 lbs
    D800, D300, D50(ir converted), FujiX100, Canon G11, Olympus TG2. Nikon lenses - 24mm 2.8, 35mm 1.8, (5 in all)50mm, 60mm, 85mm 1.8, 105vr, 105 f2.5, 180mm 2.8, 70-200vr1, 24-120vr f4. Tokina 12-24mm, 16-28mm, 28-70mm (angenieux design), 300mm f2.8. Sigma 15mm fisheye. Voigtlander R2 (olive) & R2a, Voigt 35mm 2.5, Zeiss 50mm f/2, Leica 90mm f/4. I know I missed something...
  • PB_PMPB_PM Posts: 4,494Member
    edited December 2013
    I'd rather have overkill that lasts than cheap junk. :P

    Honestly, if you want to carry around Manfrotto tripods and replace them every ten years be my guest. I'll be keeping my Gitzo for the next 30+ years.
    Post edited by PB_PM on
    If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
  • Parke1953Parke1953 Posts: 456Member
    I just realized that just about anything I buy now will out last me. LOL
  • ChasCSChasCS Posts: 309Member
    @Parke1953,
    But admittedly, we both agree, '53 was a very good year... ;-)

    At least if brought me into the light, from the darkness!!
    D800, AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR, B+W Clear MRC 77mm, AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Sigma DG UV 77mm,
    SB-910~WG-AS3, SB-50, ME-1, Lexar Professional 600x 64GB SDXC UHS-I 90MB/s* x2, 400x 32GB SDHC UHS-I 60MB/s* x1
    Vanguard ALTA PRO 263AT, GH-300T, SBH-250, SBH-100, PH-22 Panhead
    Lowepro S&F Deluxe Technical Belt and Harness ~ Pouch 60 AW 50 AW & 10, S&F Toploader 70 AW, Lens Case 11 x 26cm
    FE, NIKKOR 2-20mm f/1.8, OPTEX UV 52mm, Vivitar Zoom 285, Kodacolor VR 1000 CF 135-24 EXP DX 35mm, rePlay XD1080

  • PaRealtorPaRealtor Posts: 95Member
    edited December 2013

    Photography is an expensive hobby/career. That said there are some items that seem very expensive at first, but more than pay for themselves in the long run. When purchasing gear (camera bodies aside) don't just think of a 1-2 year period, think of the usage over a 5 or 10+ year period. When you look at it long term, buying a high end product today is actually cheaper.
    So True! I will keep that in mind. Have to remember quality equipment is also important! A friend of mine is still using her D90 (strictly a hobby) and her photos are gorgeous after all these years!
    Post edited by PaRealtor on
  • PhotobugPhotobug Posts: 5,751Member
    +1 PaRealtor. So many people don't master their cameras. Once you do you can really optimize the results and get a higher number of keepers. Good luck and welcome.
    D750 & D7100 | 24-70 F2.8 G AF-S ED, 70-200 F2.8 AF VR, TC-14E III, TC-1.7EII, 35 F2 AF D, 50mm F1.8G, 105mm G AF-S VR | Backup & Wife's Gear: D5500 & Sony HX50V | 18-140 AF-S ED VR DX, 55-300 AF-S G VR DX |
    |SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
  • PaRealtorPaRealtor Posts: 95Member
    Thank you!! Looking forward to learning all about my New equipment.
  • MsmotoMsmoto Posts: 5,398Moderator
    Let's see, photography, sail boats, swimming pools, motorhomes, all can be very expensive hobbies. And, at the same time, I see images all the time taken with a D70s, and $200 lens which can certainly rival what I shoot.

    I think the point is, which has been discussed here, is learning the camera is the key. Whether one has a $100 or $1000 tripod will never make as much difference as understanding what the camera is doing and utilizing its capabilities properly.

    Oh, 1942 was a very good year. LOL
    Msmoto, mod
  • WestEndBoyWestEndBoy Posts: 1,456Member
    edited December 2013
    I find myself saying the same thing as Msmoto just said to numerous people on a regular basis that ask my about my gear. It is out of reach for most. They ask why I spent so much and we all know the answers to that question.

    I find it gives them comfort and encouragement about their photography hobby.
    Post edited by WestEndBoy on
  • ChasCSChasCS Posts: 309Member
    Pricey, but worth every penny pinched...
    A little pride in ownership goes a long way there too.
    Funny to me, how many of us, pride ourselves in our photographic collections/possessions, but then go and knock ourselves down, for the, in our own minds, poor quality of the shoot.
    Like it's been said, many many times before.
    There are thousands of pictures taken every single day, but very few real "keepers", much like fishing...
    D800, AF-S NIKKOR 80-400mm f/4.5-5.6G ED VR, B+W Clear MRC 77mm, AF-S NIKKOR 24-120mm f/4G ED VR, Sigma DG UV 77mm,
    SB-910~WG-AS3, SB-50, ME-1, Lexar Professional 600x 64GB SDXC UHS-I 90MB/s* x2, 400x 32GB SDHC UHS-I 60MB/s* x1
    Vanguard ALTA PRO 263AT, GH-300T, SBH-250, SBH-100, PH-22 Panhead
    Lowepro S&F Deluxe Technical Belt and Harness ~ Pouch 60 AW 50 AW & 10, S&F Toploader 70 AW, Lens Case 11 x 26cm
    FE, NIKKOR 2-20mm f/1.8, OPTEX UV 52mm, Vivitar Zoom 285, Kodacolor VR 1000 CF 135-24 EXP DX 35mm, rePlay XD1080

  • tiCreativeMediatiCreativeMedia Posts: 81Member
    boy, this thread is BIG... @proudgeek I have the mefoto now and it's just nowhere near sturdy enough. I don't think the head can even hold that big lens. I used it with my 105 lens last thing and it was even vibrating on that. it does however have the hook, as @kyoshinikon mentions.
    D7100, 35mm 1:1.8G, 10-24mm f/3.5-4.5G ED AF-S DX, 24-70mm f/2.8G ED, 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II, AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED
  • MsmotoMsmoto Posts: 5,398Moderator
    edited December 2013
    IMO one wants a minimum weight capacity of 30 pounds….this requires about $200 investment for the legs…..Add at least $100 for a head. Thus, $300 minimum. Almost anything less will have performance problems at sometime or another…Just my opinion.

    What one gets with the $1500 set up is much nicer finish, function, reliability, and of course the name…LOL
    Post edited by Msmoto on
    Msmoto, mod
  • heartyfisherheartyfisher Posts: 3,192Member
    I am sure its nice to have a $1000 tripod with 18Kg carrying capacity but my heaviest kit is 2kg and i don't take that for travel..
    Moments of Light - D610 D7K S5pro 70-200f4 18-200 150f2.8 12-24 18-70 35-70f2.8 : C&C very welcome!
    Being a photographer is a lot like being a Christian: Some people look at you funny but do not see the amazing beauty all around them - heartyfisher.

  • WestEndBoyWestEndBoy Posts: 1,456Member
    I like this, weighs a bit more than zero (8.5oz) but will hold 6+lbs

    http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/470237-REG/Joby_GP3_A1EN_Gorillapod_SLR_Zoom_Flexible_Mini_Tripod.html

    image
    I just bought this one to hold my SB-910. When my 8 year old boy opens his J3 for Christmas, he can use it to.
  • PB_PMPB_PM Posts: 4,494Member
    For small cameras, or a DSLR with a light weight prime, gorillapods are great. Defiantly worth looking at. Like at @jshickele I tend to use it for mounting flashes.
    If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
  • mikepmikep Posts: 280Member
    @mikeP: If you feel that their is a specific model and manufacture for the end user to consider by all means provide us with the link and tell us why you have chosen that model
    to be honest, i think that digitalrev video is very disingenuous, and it compares a gitzo to some cheap rubbish tripods that can be had in hongkong for maybe $10 each.

    a gitzo compared to a $100 aluminium tripod will be very similar in performance.

    the manfrotto i have, a 055XDB, it weighs 2kg, goes higher than my 1.8kg gitzo, i have had it 5 years and its great in every way. i just set it up, lay on the floor underneath it, grabbed the centre column and lifted myself off the floor for 5 seconds and it took my body weight no problem. ie, it didnt collpase with my 80kg (180lb) body hanging from underneath it. ie, i just put the weight of sixty seven nikon d4s and it handled it without failing.

    i just have an issue with recommending newcommers, or anyone else looking for tripod advice to buy $1000 tripods when there are so many great options out there for $100. as far as i can see the only reason to buy a carbon tripod is so your hands dont get cold when you touch it in the winter .... and to me, that is not worth $900

    as a side, expensive tripods also do not hold much in the way of resale value, buy for $1000 today, get $500 tomorrow on ebay if you are lucky

    carbon tripods are great, but they are not needed, and certainly not for beginners, or anyone else, unless the person doesnt care about the money.

    and lastly, you would be wrong to assume, as someone up there did, that professionals use expensive equipment all the time. totally wrong. in my experience hobbyists and gear-heads are the ones more likely to buy expensive gear, while people who are in the business of photography are likely to try to keep their costs to a minimum and use cheaper (yet perfectly viable) options. the hobbyist watches a youtube vid and assumes that they need a d4 and a gitzo to take a picture of a tree, the professional knows they can get the job done with a far cheaper setup.

  • JordanpaulJordanpaul Posts: 1Member
    Manfrotto tripod is the best tripod,I am having the same since 2 years.
    Still new as i bought today..
  • framerframer Posts: 491Member
    Manfrotto tripod is the best tripod,I am having the same since 2 years.
    Still new as i bought today..
    LOL

  • PhotobugPhotobug Posts: 5,751Member
    My Gitzo 3 series carbon fiber tripod with 4 extensions fits into my larger luggage. It sure beats the aluminum ones I had before it. Have had it about six years and my only complaint...why the heck didn't I buy it 10-15 years ago.
    D750 & D7100 | 24-70 F2.8 G AF-S ED, 70-200 F2.8 AF VR, TC-14E III, TC-1.7EII, 35 F2 AF D, 50mm F1.8G, 105mm G AF-S VR | Backup & Wife's Gear: D5500 & Sony HX50V | 18-140 AF-S ED VR DX, 55-300 AF-S G VR DX |
    |SB-800, Amaran Halo LED Ring light | MB-D16 grip| Gitzo GT3541 + RRS BH-55LR, Gitzo GM2942 + Sirui L-10 | RRS gear | Lowepro, ThinkTank, & Hoodman gear | BosStrap | Vello Freewave Plus wireless Remote, Leica Lens Cleaning Cloth |
  • sevencrossingsevencrossing Posts: 2,800Member
    edited May 2015
    like the OP I am looking at the Manfrotto Befree Travel Tripod MKBFRA4-BH

    For sale on Amazon UK @ £113

    I already have a rugged Manfrotto 055PROB with several heads brackets and Quick Release Plates

    I don't use tripods very often so I don't want the cost of switching to RRS or Gitzo

    I want this one to live in the camper van, where space is at a premium

    has anyone got first hand experience of the model



    Post edited by sevencrossing on
  • spraynprayspraynpray Posts: 6,545Moderator
    edited May 2015
    People saying they use a normal tripod for travel isn't really helping the thread. A 'travel tripod' will always be smaller and lighter than a normal tripod and as such will be a compromise on rigidity and capacity (otherwise everybody would buy one and use it as their normal tripod). When a low budget is stipulated, more of a compromise must take place.

    I do take my normal tripod with me when I travel as it is light enough to carry easily and small enough to fit in a full size suitcase in the hold. My tripod is the minimum I need and I will not buy anything of lower specification so therefore I don't have a travel tripod. If, however, your travel kit includes a small light camera, then sure, tripods like the Befree will work ok, but I take my DSLRs on holiday with me so those model types are no good for me.

    @sevencrossing: I don't have first-hand experience of that model, but am deeply suspicious of Manfrotto tripods below my 055CXPRO3 as even the 190 range (very popular) is 'twangy' by comparison.
    Post edited by spraynpray on
    Always learning.
Sign In or Register to comment.