D5 -- What will it take to make you upgrade from a D3s, D4, or D4s to a D5?

12357

Comments

  • rmprmp Posts: 586Member
    >
    I'll buy one of Snowleopard's versions. :-)
    Robert M. Poston: D4, D810, V3, 14-24 F2.8, 24-70 f2.8, 70-200 f2.8, 80-400, 105 macro.
  • PB_PMPB_PM Posts: 4,494Member
    edited December 2015
    1) Internal Wifi AC or AD
    2) 16 bit raw
    3) 1:1 ratio on pixel count for 24x36 inch prints (so 75-120mp)
    4) 20 FPS in still mode
    5) 8k raw video
    6) Noiseless ISO's up to and including ISO 5,120,000
    7) 256 cross type focus points
    8) 10 Gigabit Eithernet
    9) 2 XLR ports
    10) Display port instead of HDMI
    11) USB 3.1
    12) Waist level view finder option.
    Lets see
    1) Should happen, but most likely won't
    2) Maybe, but unlikely
    3) Not likely to see either in the pro sports camera, I doubt Nikon could put in a big enough buffer to deal with the file size and speed requirements for the camera, that is unless you want the camera to get a lot bigger.
    4) Not likely, the mirror couldn't move fast enough, so AF would be disabled beyond a given speed (14FPS most likely)
    5) This is Nikon we are talking about, they don't even have 4k yet.
    6) Possible, maybe next generation
    7) Doesn't look like it from the rumors
    8) Should have it, but unlikely
    9) It's a DSLR, not a video camera
    10) Next gen HDMI makes way more sense than DP, which the current version of cannot support 8k, which is what you want apparently.
    11) Do you not own a card reader? Unless you are tethered shooting all the time, no reason for it.
    12) Don't count on it.
    Post edited by PB_PM on
    If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
  • SportsSports Posts: 365Member
    Now, this is an honest list. Currently, I'm nowhere near the price level, but if the perfect camera body was suddenly available, I would be tempted, of course.
    Imagine a camera that most shooters would see as the best. The D4 is kind of a niche camera, At least it's a very specialized machine. Why not try to attract more enthusiasts?
    Back to my (late Saturday night) list. What could make me buy one?
    - like the expected D5 (extreme low-light sensitivity, extreme AF and metering, grip, don't care too much about megapixels, but others may want at least 24)
    - built-in wi-fi
    - perfect compatibility with my current 3rd party lenses
    - video with AF that actually works (not just a check in the specifications)
    - built-in flash (it may not be "pro", but the built-in flash is very convenient - you should just not use it if you don't like it)
    - articulated screen (not "pro"?? The king of all cameras should have it, IMHO)
    D300, J1
    Sigma 70-200/2.8, 105/2.8
    Nikon 50/1.4G, 18-200, 80-400G
    1 10-30, 30-110
  • Vipmediastar_JZVipmediastar_JZ Posts: 1,708Member
    9) 2 XLR ports
    10) Display port instead of HDMI
    If you want to use it as video camera with the latest Tascam DR-701D you can sync audio via the HDMI. Start and stop on camera, starts and stops on Tascam.
  • snakebunksnakebunk Posts: 993Member
    36 mp and only slightly more expensive than D810.
  • PB_PMPB_PM Posts: 4,494Member
    Haha, wishful thinking. If anything the price of the D5 will be $500-1000 more than the D4s was at launch.
    If I take a good photo it's not my camera's fault.
  • WestEndFotoWestEndFoto Posts: 3,745Member

    - perfect compatibility with my current 3rd party lenses
    I expect Nikon to be working on the opposite. Perhaps a discrete algorithm that recognized a G or E lens and as models are released, progressively slows down the auto-focus of non-G or E lenses.
  • snakebunksnakebunk Posts: 993Member
    Haha, wishful thinking. If anything the price of the D5 will be $500-1000 more than the D4s was at launch.
    I know it won't happen. I just answered the question.
  • SnowleopardSnowleopard Posts: 244Member
    Let's be honest here.... Some people might get a laugh or 2 from what I feel the D5 should be...... but The D4 was a pipe dream back in 1998 when the first Digital SLR's created in Nikon bodies with Kodak came out....

    So more power to my list..... :-) Merry Christmas
    ||COOLPIX 5000|●|D70|●|D700|●|D810|●|AF-S NIKKOR 14-24mm f/2.8G ED|●|AF Nikkor 20mm f/2.8D|●|AF Nikkor 50mm f/1.4D|●|AF-S NIKKOR 50mm f/1.4G|●|AF Micro-Nikkor 60mm f/2.8D|●|AF-S Micro Nikkor 60mm f/2.8G ED|●|AF-S VR Zoom-NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G IF-ED (Silver)|●|AF-S Teleconverter TC-20E III|●|PB-6 Bellows|●|EL-NIKKOR 50mm f/2.8||
  • manhattanboymanhattanboy Posts: 1,003Member
    So the D5 has now been announced
    image
    What do folks think?
  • donaldejosedonaldejose Posts: 3,865Member
    Need more details . . . .
  • ShuntoShunto Posts: 6Member
    Anything has to be an upgrade from my D3.. Having just sold mine in anticipation of the D5 going on sale..- so I can still buy a good condition D4S(maybe still find a brand new one).. $4k(not much less) I'm still in love with the D4S's Low light capabilities.
  • MsmotoMsmoto Posts: 5,398Moderator
    edited January 2016
    I was fascinated by the example images of motorcycles on the D5 announcement...I have been doing these for years....
    Superbikes Road America

    See his eyes here:
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/7338982246/sizes/o/

    But, I suspect once I see and feel a D5, this could be expensive.....yikes!
    Post edited by Msmoto on
    Msmoto, mod
  • manhattanboymanhattanboy Posts: 1,003Member
    @Msmoto I think your motorcycle pics are better than the ones in the Nikon Facebook post, perhaps they should have asked you to shoot the promos!
  • MsmotoMsmoto Posts: 5,398Moderator
    @manhattanboy

    Thanks, these are with the 400/2.8 and TC20EIII on a D4. Really simple to do if one has the patience...
    Msmoto, mod
  • IronheartIronheart Posts: 3,017Moderator
    ...Really simple to do if one has the patience...
    Sounds like something Ansel would say...
  • manhattanboymanhattanboy Posts: 1,003Member
    Wonder if Nikon will offer "white glove" delivery for the new D5
    image
  • CaMeRaQuEsTCaMeRaQuEsT Posts: 357Member
    Finally, Nikon is focusing on skin tones. This, to me, is the greatest news from Nikon in the digital era. At last they are attacking Canon head-on on their turf.
  • dissentdissent Posts: 1,355Member
    If I won the lottery I would so get 1 or 2 of these.
    - Ian . . . [D7000, D7100; Nikon glass: 35 f1.8, 85 f1.8, 70-300 VR, 105 f2.8 VR, 12-24 f4; 16-85 VR, 300 f4D, 14E-II TC, SB-400, SB-700 . . . and still plenty of ignorance]
  • CaMeRaQuEsTCaMeRaQuEsT Posts: 357Member
    4K at x1.5 crop only (Super 35), so not a 1D C killer, at least in that regard.
  • NSXTypeRNSXTypeR Posts: 2,293Member
    Any note on the D5 including Snapbridge? It seems like an odd exclusion for a $6,500 camera. I was also trying to see if the D7200 has it. If it does, I don't have to really lust for the D500. I know it already has WiFi though.
    Nikon D7000/ Nikon D40/ Nikon FM2/ 18-135 AF-S/ 35mm 1.8 AF-S/ 105mm Macro AF-S/ 50mm 1.2 AI-S
  • IronheartIronheart Posts: 3,017Moderator
    edited January 2016
    The only camera that currently has snapbridge is the D500. The D7200 has NFC, which is a wifi protocol. Snapbridge is BLE. (Bluetooth low energy)

    "SnapBridge will be a standard feature in almost every Nikon camera from 2016 onwards, beginning with the new D500."

    Read more on NikonRumors.com: http://nikonrumors.com/2016/01/05/nikon-announces-new-snapbridge-connectivity-for-photo-transfer-and-sharing.aspx/#ixzz3wTWbFdBw
    Post edited by Ironheart on
Sign In or Register to comment.