Adam, love the lion shot. I know you asked about tree branches a few months back and I think they provide a lot of context. D90 | 300mm | f/5 | 1/1600s | ISO 400
D3100, kit lens, f11, SB600 mounted to left side of the camera on a flash bracket with the diffusion panel down to soften the light. Tomorrow I will post the same flower shot the same way except the diffusion panel is up for more contrast or harsher light. Since the flash head is large compared to the size of the subject, the contrast is not too great without the diffusion panel. But tastes differ and I am trying to see how I can easily produce different effects in close-ups.
Hi "itsnotmeyouknow" great shot, yes that's a very popular waterfall and usually filled with tourists so I usually try to stay away especially during busy holiday times. In general I am not much of a people person when it comes to photography. It is a beautiful spot though you are right.
This is Gwaneumsa Temple during the Buddhist birthday celebrations last week. Had to wait until someone entered the frame I was surprised but I guess it too early in the morning:
@ TNXTypeR, I thought for sure you captured that above the coast of Africa or South America somewhere. This raises the question...Did we "really" land on the moon?
Thank you! That was exactly the kind of effect I was trying to get. If I could get that milk to be more blue and get a more green mold, I might be able to pull it off.
But then at that point I don't think it would be a good idea to keep it around. I think the mold was grown on some expired heavy cream, which would explain the yellow tint on the "sea".
I like the first one better myself but even the second one is not too harsh IMO. The shadows are not black; there is some fill light even though this is just one flash. My guess is that the relative size of the flash head compared to the size of the subject makes the flash head a much larger soft-box than we seem to realize. The relative ratio might compare to using a 4 x 3 foot soft box on a person. When photographing at 1:1 the flash head might compare to a 6 foot tall soft box used with a person.
You are right on this Donald, but the softness of the light depends on the distance of the subject from the box. This softness decrease very fast, when you are further away from the box, so when you want soft light, get as close as you can get. Something for a topic, I think there is one now.
edit: I see now you are on it
Post edited by [Deleted User] on
Those who say it can't be done, should not interrupt those doing it!
It's been raining here for 3 straight days and it's now 45 degrees. If you think I'm going outside to shoot anything new forget it. Taken a few years back in the Galapagos. D90 | 80-400 | 220mm | f/8 | 1/1000s | ISO 400
Comments
D90 | 300mm | f/5 | 1/1600s | ISO 400
D3100, kit lens, f11, SB600 mounted to left side of the camera on a flash bracket with the diffusion panel down to soften the light. Tomorrow I will post the same flower shot the same way except the diffusion panel is up for more contrast or harsher light. Since the flash head is large compared to the size of the subject, the contrast is not too great without the diffusion panel. But tastes differ and I am trying to see how I can easily produce different effects in close-ups.
D300 * Tokina 300 F2.8 + Tamron 1.4x TC * 420mm * F8 * ISO 400 * 1/1250 * -.66 EC
Larger
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fantinesfotos/8818383718/sizes/o/
Nikon D800 | Nikkor 80-400 4.5-5.6 | 1/400 | f5.6 ISO 400
This is Gwaneumsa Temple during the Buddhist birthday celebrations last week. Had to wait until someone entered the frame I was surprised but I guess it too early in the morning:
But then at that point I don't think it would be a good idea to keep it around. I think the mold was grown on some expired heavy cream, which would explain the yellow tint on the "sea".
Nikon D600, 1/60 at f/11, ISO 1600.
I only needed the center, so I put the D600 in crop mode, nice feature on the D600.
D4 24-70 2.8 1/3200 ISO 800 @ f/8.0
D3100, kit lens, f16, SB600 mounted on bracket to the side of the body.
My guess is that the relative size of the flash head compared to the size of the subject makes the flash head a much larger soft-box than we seem to realize. The relative ratio might compare to using a 4 x 3 foot soft box on a person. When photographing at 1:1 the flash head might compare to a 6 foot tall soft box used with a person.
edit: I see now you are on it
D90 * Tamron 200-500, F8, 1/800th, ISO 560, +1 EC
D90 | 80-400 | 220mm | f/8 | 1/1000s | ISO 400
fountain pen cleaning day